I still don't know who this "Bee-yonce" character is, but I'm glad Apple is happy with her.
I'm proud to announce I was not a purchaser.
I still don't know who this "Bee-yonce" character is, but I'm glad Apple is happy with her.
-talentless
+overrated
Start laughing loudly, then after 6 seconds increase the volume of your laugh by 250%.How does one Laugh out loud...out loud?
Nice line in snark you have there.
We've gone backwards in audio quality while the quality of video (VHS to DVD to BRD and now 4k) has come on in leaps and bounds in the same timeframe.
Straw man aside, the bottom line is that music from the ITMS isn't even as good a quality that as that found on audio CDs. That technology is decades old.
Nice line in snark you have there.
Straw man aside, the bottom line is that music from the ITMS isn't even as good a quality that as that found on audio CDs. That technology is decades old.
We've gone backwards in audio quality while the quality of video (VHS to DVD to BRD and now 4k) has come on in leaps and bounds in the same timeframe.
I have to disagree about Lady Gaga. Find me another pop artist that can play 15 instruments, writes their own lyrics, and can sing without synth.
Now if it is just for iTunes only, then I would understand. Just saying that it "breaks records" is a bit misleading...
music from the ITMS isn't even as good a quality that as that found on audio CDs.
Same here. I bought the iTunes version of "We Can't Stop" by Miley Cyrus so I could explore it in a non-radio environment. Once I decided that I really liked the song I bought the CD from Amazon.
Not only do I have a durable hard copy the difference between CD "We Can't Stop" and iTunes "We Can't Stop" is dramatic. Had it been released at HDTracks I would have gotten it there and skipped the CD.
iTunes is a great place to buy previews but that is about it if you appreciate high-quality sound reproduction.
It is just for iTunes only. Again, who said it "breaks records" other than that?
..In a press release today, Apple said the album is the fastest selling ever on the iTunes Store, moving 828,773 units worldwide in its first three days of availability. The album sold 617,213 copies in the U.S., and went to number one on the iTunes chart in 104 countries.
Article Link: iTunes-Exclusive Beyonce Album Breaks Records With 828,773 Copies Sold in 3 Days
It's a real shame that in 2013 the music industry is still dominated by clever marketing over good content. Wiggle your fat ass in a music video and you sell loads of records whether or not you can actually sing. Tragic. No wonder the music industry is going down the toilet.
Not so. Good things can be popular. But in case they are not.As in mutually exclusive.
Good in this instance is very opinionated. You could say it sold well therefore it's good and you'd be correct. Someone else could say the music quality is bad therefore it's bad and they'd be correct too. It all depends on what aspect you are saying is good or bad.I have not listened to it yet, mainly because I have never really been all that into Beyonce, but from all of my entertainment friends, dancers, DJs, etc, it appears that this album is VERY good. Again, I have not personally listened to it, but there has been no negative on it.
Thank you.Completely agree.
Quality is subjective. I agree.This is true: Quality is subjective. Popularity is objective.
Also, did you even listen to the album or are you just posting for the sake of saying something snarky?
The question left to be asked is...
If the marketing were the same (all's fair in being equal), would we have the same argument here if the artist were, say, Dexy's Midnight Runners, Kajagoogoo, Thompson Twins, Bay City Rollers, Eric Carmen, Martika, Shaun Colvin, Eagle Eye Cherry, and Shelley Farbares (just pulling names out of my head from various decades)?
If so, then music would definitely be in a bad state, because marketing would take precedence over the artist's content.
BL.
What? Your subjective taste in music is different than someone else's? Tell me more.
Did you know that "pop" is short for popular music? You just said, "I'll never understand [popular] music's popularity."
That's all there is too it. Pop music is what's popular. That's it. It changes with what's popular.
_______
Question: what artist/band held the record before this?
Not sure I follow your argument but sadly the music industry has all too often been about style over substance to make a quick buck for record companies, as your list clearly demonstrates.
I've heard better singers busking on my local high street than Beyonce but she sells records because she has the marketing juggernaut behind her.
if you're going to claim that something breaks records, you should have a good comparison as to what record it broke.
fastest selling ever on the iTunes Store
Okay.. flame suit is ready, so anyone who gets uptight about it, fire away.
I'm trying to figure out how this is a 'record breaker'. Let's do the math here. From the OP:
This means that to make that 828773 number, another 211,560 albums were sold in that three days time. But let's also just take the US numbers alone. That 617,213 was in three days. So let's whack that into thirds:
617213 / 3 = 205737 albums per day.
By contrast, on VH1 Classic Albums: Hysteria, Mercury Records VP David Leach mentioned that during the run of Def Leppard's Hysteria, because of Pour Some Sugar On Me, they had sold 450,000 copies of Hysteria, in one day.
That's nearly going Gold, in one day, where Gold is 500,000 albums sold.
Beyonce's album sales per day still has another 250,000 to go to even catch Hysteria, and that was done 27 years ago.
So how has this broken any records?
BL.
I don't care for her music, I never liked all that r'n'b-pop stuff, but I definitely wouldn't consider her talentless, she's doing well at what she is doing and the execution of her music is flawless (something that many bands in the stale (and by now embarrasing) "future pop" scene could use)...
Anyway, it's hard to tell if this is a one time success stunt which can be repeated by others equally successful, especially as she's a major act which has been established for years now. Reminds me of the NIN "free music" phase before Reznor went crawling back to the majors admitting that he relied on them.