I completely agree with you. I have a mid-2009 13" MBP, Snow Leopard installed. 3 years after I bought it, my mac began to perform very slow. Upgraded the RAM from 2GB to 4GB, and changed the HDD to SSD. And I was amazed on how fast and smooth it performs now, just as fast (if not faster) when I bought it 38 months ago.
Proud user of Snow Leopard.
On March 23, 2011, Apple announced that Bertrand Serlet was leaving the company "to focus less on products and more on science."
According to BusinessInsider, he has founded a startup in cloud computing called "Upthere" with other former Apple employees.
In July, 2012 he joined the board of directors of Parallels, Inc.
I'd caution against making ASSumptions based on SL installs because many that have SL and cannot upgrade would do so if they could.
With Lion Server and now Mountain Lion Server, the software has followed the hardware in becoming cheaper and simpler, and in shifting its focus from large businesses to small ones... As the product has gotten cheaper and within reach of regular people, the tools used to administer it have become correspondingly less complex, both in terms of how difficult they are to use and in how powerful they are.
My fear in this brave new world is that OS X Server will suffer the same fate as Apple Remote Desktop, another enormously useful tool if you're trying to manage a large number of Macs. Remote Desktop's last major update, version 3.0, was introduced all the way back in 2006. Though it is still technically being maintained and sold in the Mac App Store—its current version is 3.6—most of those point updates have served only to add compatibility with new OS X versions and add incremental feature improvements like IPv6 support.
There's still some good, low-hanging fruit that Apple could harvest to make OS X Server better for the kinds of users they're gunning for—things like centralized FileVault management, the ability to patch iOS with the Software Update service, and local iOS device backups. If the software goes into maintenance mode, I worry that we'll never see server features that keep pace with the features in the OS X client.
The fact that Mountain Lion is not adopted faster than Lion or Snow Leopard sure must be a disappointment for Apple since it can be easily purchased in the Mac AppStore, to which most users should have access by now.
At the time Lion was released, not that many people had access to the AppStore, and Snow Leopard had to be purchased the old school way.
Does anyone else here have a hard time remembering the order of the OSes? Off the top of my head, I can tell which is 10.8 by the look of the graph but 10.7 or 10.6?
You mean Vista users can use iCloud, bur SL users can't?(*that Apple supported Vista over Snow Leopard - tossers!)
The forced use of the AppStore is the number one reason why I will not upgrade, nor buy new Apple hardware.
Old school or not, I insist upon being able to privately purchase my needs.
Fortunately for both of you, it's very easy to purchase software from places other than the Mac App Store.well shut my mouth. was just gonna say exactly the same.
besides all that, having your entire life and things you purchase umbilical corded to the internet.... might as well have them put a monitoring chip in your head right now and get it over with
I wonder if you would feel the same the way if car companies did the same thing. I own a 2006 Camry. What if I have a problem with my car and Toyota says you need to upgrade to newer model to drive it
Fortunately for both of you, it's very easy to purchase software from places other than the Mac App Store.
The forced use of the AppStore is the number one reason why I will not upgrade, nor buy new Apple hardware.
Old school or not, I insist upon being able to privately purchase my needs.
What forced use of the AppStore?
I had to buy a new car to get side impact air bags. Wasn't even an available option for my old car. Neither was the hybrid power train. Should I have expected the manufacturer to add both of those to my old car?
Snow Leopard is a Classic - it did put a big mark in the computing world
As you pointed out to many, that's your opinion and assumption. Statistically, the number of users running Snow Leopard has increased, especially on new Mac hardware shipped post 10.6. Thus, statistically (that tricky word again), it appears OS X users are actively installing Snow Leopard on new systems, especially servers. Here's an interesting read (long yet detail oriented) on the changes between OS X Server 10.6 and 10.7/8:
Server, simplified: A power user's guide to OS X Server
It is because of reasons such as the above that many have reverted to Snow Leopard Server and Consumer; they have proven to be solid OS X builds with the features most require. 10.7 Lion was the first time in over a decade I have read many complaints; certainly every OS has its fair share of issues. Yet it has been a far different story since 10.6, even more apparent on the developer boards as numerous recognized bugs are still open and unresolved, even from 10.7.
Why do I get the feeling Apple is running out of big cats to name their future OSX releases?
The fact that Mountain Lion is not adopted faster than Lion or Snow Leopard sure must be a disappointment for Apple since it can be easily purchased in the Mac AppStore, to which most users should have access by now.
At the time Lion was released, not that many people had access to the AppStore, and Snow Leopard had to be purchased the old school way.
What's even left at this point? 10.9 Cuddly Kitten?
The forced use of the AppStore is the number one reason why I will not upgrade, nor buy new Apple hardware.
Old school or not, I insist upon being able to privately purchase my needs.