Might see 1 update in its lifetime, has very few apps to choose from that are good, and when you buy the app for that device good luck getting it for your other devices for 'free' too.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Phil Schiller Defends iPad Mini Pricing Decision
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
Might see 1 update in its lifetime, has very few apps to choose from that are good, and when you buy the app for that device good luck getting it for your other devices for 'free' too.
I guess in todays world with devices we throw away every year for the latest and greatest, $30 actually makes a psychological different in terms of pricing.
I can't believe that $30 is really a deal breaker to some of you people who have a Mac, iPhone, iPad and now want an iPad Mini.
I can't believe that $30 is really a deal breaker to some of you people who have a Mac, iPhone, iPad and now want an iPad Mini.
I was hoping for a $199-$249 product, as such I would have purchased it in addition to my regular iPad, as more of a dedicated ereader. I also likely would have used it as a gift item.
At $329, it's priced out of range for those things.
With that said, Apple took a different approach to the product than I expected. While I expected an item that would sell alongside and in addition to the full sized iPad, what Apple did was essentially place the iPad mini as the mainstream iPad product, and the iPad "with Retina display" as the premium, all while keeping the price of that product the same.
For me, I'll choose a full sized iPad with retina, but a lot of people don't care about that and may be quite happy with the iPad mini.
Having the two products available will also take some pressure off the supply chain when new ones launch, with customers buying one or the other, we likely won't see the stores running out of supply and scalpers won't have any demand to snatch up everything and sell it on eBay.
At $329, it's priced out of range for those things.
With that said, Apple took a different approach to the product than I expected. While I expected an item that would sell alongside and in addition to the full sized iPad, what Apple did was essentially place the iPad mini as the mainstream iPad product, and the iPad "with Retina display" as the premium, all while keeping the price of that product the same.
For me, I'll choose a full sized iPad with retina, but a lot of people don't care about that and may be quite happy with the iPad mini.
Having the two products available will also take some pressure off the supply chain when new ones launch, with customers buying one or the other, we likely won't see the stores running out of supply and scalpers won't have any demand to snatch up everything and sell it on eBay.
The screen is arguably the most important attribute of a tablet, and the Nexus 7's is mediocre (viewing angles, washed out, colors way off after viewing videos). I haven't seen the iPad mini in person, but I expect its screen quality to be superior to the Nexus 7. Yes the Nexus' 1280x800 is nice, but I'd be OK with losing 23% of the pixels while gaining both quality and size (the iPad mini's screen area is 36% larger).
The Nexus 7 reportedly has widespread quality control problems, and my own anecdotal experience supports this. I had to swap out two of them before finally getting one that wasn't defective (and it still has a minor blotch in the middle of the screen under the glass that I decided to live with).
Fit and finish is poor: All three of my Nexus 7s had the left-side screen rise/flex (though the third one isn't as bad as the first two). The iPad mini is more expensive, but if build quality is anything like the larger iPad, it's going to blow away the Nexus 7.
I'm not sure what the clock speed of the iPad mini is, but I'd be surprised if its A5 isn't at least as zippy as the Nexus 7's Tegra3.
Another advantage to the iPad mini is that it's thinner and weighs less.
Having written that, I prefer the Nexus 7's 16:10 aspect ratio because it allows for a narrower device. I haven't held an iPad mini, but being 5.3" wide will make it less portable and more of a PITA to use one-handed. For me, that form factor difference combined with the price advantage offset many of the iPad mini's other advantages.
It isn't a game. The U.S. dollar is weak. You cannot compare prices from countries with stronger currencies against the prices for like products in countries with weak currencies. This phony comparison is always going to make it look like people in the country with the strong currency are paying more. The thing to remember is that companies set prices for products for the markets where they are sold, not at some constantly fluctuating world price, like oil.
Note also that U.S. prices are stated before sales taxes, whereas VAT is included in the UK price. So far starters you need to back the VAT out of the UK price. This is 17% currently, is it not?
Anyway, on many forums, people wonder whether it is not better buying an iPod Touch with "Retina" screen and 32gb or waiting for a potential upgrade of this iPad Mini in few months
If someone wanted an iPad, why would they by an iPod Touch? Yes, it has a retina screen. A much smaller retina screen. The iPad Mini doesn't have a retina screen, but it's not all that far off, and I think once people actually see them attitudes might change a bit. At any rate, the iPad Mini and iPod Touch are very different devices, and I don't really get the talk about overlap. There likely won't be any more iPad updates until this time next year, so waiting isn't going to do anything but prevent you from enjoying one or the other for the next 12 months.
Apple just priced it right. Why, you ask.
Think about it, people will rush to buy the iPad mini, as it is a new Apple device at a very low price compared to other iPads. Plus it is a very good built product compared to other competitors.
And when iPad Mini 2 comes out next year with Retina Display, they will keep that at $329 and 1st gen to a lower price of maybe $199 to $239.
Think about it, people will rush to buy the iPad mini, as it is a new Apple device at a very low price compared to other iPads. Plus it is a very good built product compared to other competitors.
And when iPad Mini 2 comes out next year with Retina Display, they will keep that at $329 and 1st gen to a lower price of maybe $199 to $239.
Agreed. And it doesn't look like he has differed from Apple's long-standing built-in 33% profit margin.
And this isn't the first annoying pricing decision they've made. $29.00 lightning ADAPTER anyone? That's offensive.
Might see 1 update in its lifetime, has very few apps to choose from that are good, and when you buy the app for that device good luck getting it for your other devices for 'free' too.
Nexus devices get more real updates than iOS devices. For those who do not buy more than 100K apps, Google Play is plenty sufficient.
Why do they need to defend that? The A6 is finally finished, so why not release a new iPad?
I don't find $329 to be "overpriced" for what it is. However, from a marketing perspective, it seems a bit silly not to let go of $30 in order to be at the psychological price point of "under $300".
I'll probably get one for the kids anyway, so they leave my iPad 3 alone.
I'll probably get one for the kids anyway, so they leave my iPad 3 alone.
More like "Forever ungrateful, Phil."
This price point is perfect. People have gotten greedy with the competition selling their products at cost. When you don't have a very compelling product such as the Kindle Fire, or the Nexus 7. Selling it at cost sometimes is the only way to attract buyers.
Latest fast Pure Android, iPad has oversized phone interface too, plastic but feels good in hand
You get... what you pay for.
One of the greatest lessons I've learned in life and is the exact phrase I would use to describe the tech industry especially.
Sometimes people feel like they're getting the same "experience" for a discount. They're not. They don't realize it until it's too late and are "locked in" - at least for the time being.
I made the same mistake recently when I purchased the Android Razr Maxx over the iPhone 4S. I can't even begin to explain the level of regret I have with this loathsome device.
Needless to say my iPhone 5 comes next week and I'll be selling this Razr Maxx to some sucker for as much as I can get.
One of the greatest lessons I've learned in life and is the exact phrase I would use to describe the tech industry especially.
Sometimes people feel like they're getting the same "experience" for a discount. They're not. They don't realize it until it's too late and are "locked in" - at least for the time being.
I made the same mistake recently when I purchased the Android Razr Maxx over the iPhone 4S. I can't even begin to explain the level of regret I have with this loathsome device.
Needless to say my iPhone 5 comes next week and I'll be selling this Razr Maxx to some sucker for as much as I can get.
Outdated with the tech inside as well. Inside the hardware as well as the hadware?
You two are funny.
Phil Schiller says: "The iPad is far and away the most successful product in its category."
This to me says it all. I enjoy Apple products and really wish them the best. However, this comments speaks to arrogance. Their best explanation for the absurdly high price is 'we are popular', ie: we charge that much because we can.
Is this the beginning of the slope for Apple? We'll see.
This to me says it all. I enjoy Apple products and really wish them the best. However, this comments speaks to arrogance. Their best explanation for the absurdly high price is 'we are popular', ie: we charge that much because we can.
Is this the beginning of the slope for Apple? We'll see.
Also they've updated the connector now across all their lines for the holiday season; I'm a little miffed myself since I got the iPad3 back in April but at the same time, I don't have an iPhone 5 so now all my connectors match
- Status