Apple has dropped the ball on home kit. It could have been a game changer but they have basically turned it into utter garbage
In 2015 wireless bulbs shouldn't require bridge hardware. The mere idea of these existing frustrates me. They are like power bricks—yuck! The bulbs should be designed to be popped into the light fixture whereby they would appear in the app to be setup via an ad-hock connection and via password from your mobile device connect to the network. Yes, it would require more hardware and software work on Philips part to get their bulbs to work like this, but that is their job and it is technically possible. And if the bulbs cost $5 extra to do this, so be it. It would simplify setup and ownership of these bulbs greatly, and there would be savings from the lack of fussy bridge hardware.
Thanks for the explanation because I was wondering about that and you've done a great job explaining this technology. But the particular post you were responding to was (I think) a joke on the iPhone screens having inconsistent displays ranging from cool blue tints to cat pee yellow.Umm...they are Philips hue bulbs. You can set them to literally any shade of white that you want (whether cool/blue or warm/yellow...or even a super warm orange) as well as just about any color in the rainbow.
The Hue Lux and Hue White bulbs, which you can't do that with, have a fixed color temperature in the warm white range. People only equate "LED" with "blue" because they either don't pay attention to color temperature when buying bulbs themselves and are then somehow surprised, or they think of industrial applications (e.g., most LED streetlights) where cool LEDs seem to have been established as preferred (perhaps because of their greater efficiency in terms of power consumed to lumens).
Brightness was a doubt i had when i bought the first set, I can happily say that replacing my old 3 light in the Kitchen with 3 hue made me very happy, since difference when white is barely noticeable.... i am sure the 800L version would make them brighter than my old regular bulbs.if only the lights were brighter. is it some technical issue that won't let them make their bulbs bright enough?! i mean they just now got them to be 800l - a whooping 60w...
What kind of hardware might that be? I call ********.
Umm...they are Philips hue bulbs. You can set them to literally any shade of white that you want (whether cool/blue or warm/yellow...or even a super warm orange) as well as just about any color in the rainbow.
The Hue Lux and Hue White bulbs, which you can't do that with, have a fixed color temperature in the warm white range. People only equate "LED" with "blue" because they either don't pay attention to color temperature when buying bulbs themselves and are then somehow surprised, or they think of industrial applications (e.g., most LED streetlights) where cool LEDs seem to have been established as preferred (perhaps because of their greater efficiency in terms of power consumed to lumens).
I know, I know, I was just making a joke in reference to all the iPhone launch stuff.The coloured bulbs support 16 million colours. The Lux (white only) support warm to cool in white only for a cheaper price.
No kidding. As interesting as this is, no way am I spending thousands of dollars just so I don't have to get my butt up to switch the lights throughout the house. I'm interested and have the ability to get this working but cost is still an issue.
No kidding. As interesting as this is, no way am I spending thousands of dollars just so I don't have to get my butt up to switch the lights throughout the house. I'm interested and have the ability to get this working but cost is still an issue.
Do the Hue bulbs have white LEDs in them as well? Or is all the white light from them just RGB mixed together?
White created from RGB mixing has a very lousy CRI (color rendering index) and can seem unnatural when compared to a true white (continuous specrum, high CRI) light source. I'm afraid to purchase this tech only to find out the CRI is garbage.
In 2015 wireless bulbs shouldn't require bridge hardware. The mere idea of these existing frustrates me. They are like power bricks—yuck! The bulbs should be designed to be popped into the light fixture whereby they would appear in the app to be setup via an ad-hock connection and via password from your mobile device connect to the network. Yes, it would require more hardware and software work on Philips part to get their bulbs to work like this, but that is their job and it is technically possible. And if the bulbs cost $5 extra to do this, so be it. It would simplify setup and ownership of these bulbs greatly, and there would be savings from the lack of fussy bridge hardware.
In 2015 wireless bulbs shouldn't require bridge hardware. The mere idea of these existing frustrates me. (…) And if the bulbs cost $5 extra to do this, so be it. It would simplify setup and ownership of these bulbs greatly, and there would be savings from the lack of fussy bridge hardware.
But then also power consumption wise each bulb will nearly double, hue bulbs use 9W of power, versus 17W for a comparable LIFX bulb (Which uses wifi like you want.)
I thought the idea was to automate the home. If I'm doing a few bulbs here and there what about the other lights in and out of the home? The bulbs they offer are only one shape too it seems. (that I always see displayed) I could do a lamp here and there I guess but I have can lights in two sizes, small bulbs in hanging fixtures, fan bulbs, lamps, candelabra style fixtures, etc that these bulbs just don't fit. My bathroom alone has 12 bulbs above the mirrors, maybe I'm thinking too big. Still a couple hundred for a few lamps is on the same scale for me as whole house for thousands and don't you agree that if I did my whole house, I could spend a few thousand?thousands of dollars? it cost me $200 to put them into my living room and study. another one bucks to do the kitchen. major areas covered. you don't need to replace every single bulb.
also, point of reference -- in the 80s a smart home was for the very wealthy only. now anybody can do it for s few hundred bucks.
Umm...they are Philips hue bulbs. You can set them to literally any shade of white that you want (whether cool/blue or warm/yellow...or even a super warm orange) as well as just about any color in the rainbow.
The Hue Lux and Hue White bulbs, which you can't do that with, have a fixed color temperature in the warm white range. People only equate "LED" with "blue" because they either don't pay attention to color temperature when buying bulbs themselves and are then somehow surprised, or they think of industrial applications (e.g., most LED streetlights) where cool LEDs seem to have been established as preferred (perhaps because of their greater efficiency in terms of power consumed to lumens).
The coloured bulbs support 16 million colours. The Lux (white only) support warm to cool in white only for a cheaper price.
Do the Hue bulbs have white LEDs in them as well? Or is all the white light from them just RGB mixed together?
White created from RGB mixing has a very lousy CRI (color rendering index) and can seem unnatural when compared to a true white (continuous specrum, high CRI) light source. I'm afraid to purchase this tech only to find out the CRI is garbage.
Er was that a Nest thermostat in that ad (8 seconds in)? Does Phillips know something we don't?
You do realize that Blue and Yellow is the way to make green right? After all there are ONLY 3 primary color....can these bulbs pull of green color yet? Real green? versus the yellow+ blue trick they use on the old gen bulb?
Er was that a Nest thermostat in that ad (8 seconds in)? Does Phillips know something we don't?