kingtj said:
I, too, am a 3G iPod owner ... and sure, I kept hoping maybe I'd get some cool new feature with one of these updaters, and found out I didn't each time. Still, I hardly think this sort of thing justifies a stance of "I'm not buying an Apple product next time around!" ??
This was in reference to seperate experiences, not in reference to just the iPod, and certainly not in reference to just firmware updates. And I'm not threatenning Apple, I'm just saying I will choose the product that will best suit me, and at the moment, I don't think Apple will be an effective use of my money in the future. Maybe it will be anyways.
Quite frankly, I'm considering selling my iPod now, but it has nothing to do with the product itself, it's just that I carry my PDA (with 1GB memory card and some mp3s) with me all the time, and the iPod is an extra weight/bulk I don't really need, so I tend to choose not to carry it with me. It's a lot of investment for something I don't use a whole lot. My choice would be the same with a Dell DJ, or a Rio, or whatever.
kingtj said:
On the PC/Windows side of computing, firmware updates come annoyingly often, usually because either A) Microsoft is changing around low-level functions in Windows *again* and breaking compatibility with existing products, or B) advances in technology such as larger-sized IDE hard drives force PCs to get newer firmware or else be left behind. A recent Dell laptop I worked on was on the 23rd. revision of its firmware when I checked it!!
I am a Windows sysadmin (please, don't shoot), and I have to say that 1) most people, especially Mac users, blow this issue way out of proportion. I use home-brew systems for my PCs, and I rarely have to do firmware updates, unless, as you said above, absolutely needed. Stuff like updating my server to support a 200GB drive (no different from upgrading an old iMac or G3 to support OSX).
Quite frankly, most support techs don't help the world vision of Windows computers because they are morons, and break everything before thinking a problem through. Also, outsourcing sucks.
kingtj said:
Apple products just don't run into this nearly as often, because Apple controls both the hardware and the software on them. They aren't worried about ensuring their box accepts one of 800,000 possible expansion cards out there. They pretty much dictate the hardware's specs AND sell most of the peripherals that will likely ever get used with it. The others either get built to the specs Apple puts forth, or they just don't work (EG. some of these firewire hubs that G5's are frying!).
Yes, and if and when more third party hardware is available for Macs, the same issues will exist. It's kind of like the virus arguement, the benefit is partly because Microsoft/Intel/AMD is the big boy on the market. And I find it hard to argue that Apple keeping current model video cards from their machines is a good thing. Certainly Macrumors members have done their share of griping about that on these forums.
This issue is also a detriment to Macs. While my gigantic tower of a G5 has nice internal expandibility, and despite being the second generation of the machine, the pickings to actually use the internal slots is very slim. I was saddened to find that there is only one PCI TV card I could use in my G5 (Alchemy TV), and after getting it, found it couldn't hold a candle to the cheaper Hauppage PVR250 I use in my PVR box - Hardware or software wise. (Personal opinion of course, but the MPEG4 recordings are larger and worse quality than the hardware MPEG2 recordings of the PVR250).
So it's a good thing/bad thing. Like most of these arguements, it pretty much comes to a stalemate. Or we'll just argue about it till our faces turn blue.
kingtj said:
If you buy a piece of electronics of ANY type, you should do so based on the features offered at the time it's purchased. There are never any guarantees a manufacturer will keep updating/improving the product. Sure, most do for 2 or 3 years - but many don't... or else they do, but never really address specific irritating issues they promised they'd deal with back when you first bought the item.
I totally agree on purchasing suggestions. And I always do. But Apple touts themselves has having great service and support, however, in my opinion, they don't live up to it by ignoring past products after 6 months when a new product is released. This is *not* typical from the companies I generally choose to buy from, most importantly considering the price point.
Sure there are many companies that don't care about their customers. And they tend to lose them. Apple is a different market and a different following, so the rules are different.
But not for me, I love OSX, but I also think Windows XP does the job nicely, and like playing with linux and BSD, and I buy my hardware carefully, sticking to brands that have given me great products from the start, with good service and support after. At home I will work on any platform that suits my needs, right now that is an OSX G5 and a Windows XP Dell laptop. Tomorrow that could change, maybe to another Windows PC, maybe to a Powerbook (after they offer more than one mouse button
)
I'm just voicing my own opinions here, ignore me as you see fit.
*dev stops babbling