Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
i can see both sides of this argument - look at a band like Radiohead, who obsessively labor over track running orders in order to create a complete *album* and not just a collection of songs.
Originally posted by midifarm
Are these "artists" heads so far up their ass that they really think because they sell a million CD's that every song is fabulous? There are few and far between albums that are flawless. I'm all for the guys getting paid. Let's face it, compared to the label and the distributor and even the retailer the guys you actually write and perform the music get nothing, maybe $.03 per disc. Apple is offering you $.12 per song! Do the math guys. That's typically $1.20 per disc if they buy the whole thing. Something's not wired correctly!
Same with Dark Side of the Moon, but it's on iTMS. (so is The Wall, btw)Originally posted by Squire
Are those numbers accurate? Just wondering.
I think an album like "The Wall," for instance, should be listened to in its entirety. But even that album had singles.
Squire
I just saw Iron Maiden on the Roskilde festival (Denmark) and Bruce Dickinsson made a great speach. Something like: "We're now gonna play a song from our forthcomming album and I'm sure somebody here is gonna record it and send it out on the net... But that's just fine. Download it all you can because they ain't gonna play it on the radio. And if our next album is crap, download that too. But if it's great, promise me you will buy it. Do we have a deal?"
Originally posted by moby1
Soooo...These these bands don't want their music played on the radio either since most stations won't play an entire album?
Why don't they have the "artistic integrity" to tell us the real reason; they're holding out for more money.
Originally posted by gotohamish
I think an album is a work of art - and to be viewed as a whole. If I really wanted it, I'd buy it.
How about we agree to buy their albums, if they agree to offer a money-back guarantee that the album doesn't suck?"When our artists record a body of work, it's what they deem to be representative of their careers at that time."
Originally posted by Macrumors
[BThe Red Hot Chili Peppers, Metallica, Green Day and Linkin Park are
[/B]
Originally posted by CheekyGit
Just my 99 cents worth...
Originally posted by QuiteSure
These bands will eventually have to change. As an earlier poster pointed out, the single tracks are available on Kazaa and similar services. Although illegal, they do offer the "singles only" choice.
But these bands are missing out on a much deeper level. I look in my 400+ CD collection and I see:
Red Hot Chili Peppers: 0
Metallica: 0
Linkin Park:0
I also see 0 Dixie Chicks, Thorns and Coldplay, but thanks to the iTMS I have purchased several of their tracks and will certainly buy more. So the three "rebel" bands will lose me as a "sampler" of their music, because I have already demonstrated a reluctance to buy a complete album of theirs.