kgarner said:Not a technology per se, but I wish spam and spammers would be publically flogged. And then killed.
ROFL!!emw said:"Thank you for calling the Annoying Computer Technology Voting Center. Your call may be monitored, recorded, played back at office parties, or otherwise used for things over which you have no control. Sorry about that, but hey, you're the one who wanted to vote.
If you agree to the terms of the voting, please press '1'. If you disagree, please hang up."
* Boop *
"You've agreed to the terms. What a moro.. we mean Thank You. If you would like to participate in a brief phone survey, please press '1'. Otherwise, to continue to voting, please press '2'"
* Bup *
"Thank you for agreeing to vote in this week's survey. To hear your selections in English, please press '1'. To here the selections in Spanish, even though if you don't understand English you won't know what we're saying, press '2'."
* Boop *
"Okay. On to the voting. If at any time you want to exit the survey, please press '9' or hang up the phone. If you want to talk to a Voting Customer Service Representative, please press '0'.
Press '1' to cast your vote for Windows Media Center.
Press '2' to cast your vote for Pop-up windows.
Press '3' to cast your vote for Automated answering services.
Press '4' to cast -"
* Beep *
"You've pressed '3'. Is this correct? Press '1' for "Yes" and '2' fo-"
* Boop *
"You've selected an invalid response. Goodbye." *click*
emw said:"Thank you for calling the Annoying Computer Technology Voting Center. Your call may be monitored, recorded, played back at office parties, or otherwise used for things over which you have no control. Sorry about that, but hey, you're the one who wanted to vote.
If you agree to the terms of the voting, please press '1'. If you disagree, please hang up."
* Boop *
<snip>
I fully agree (though maybe with little less of the killing), as if passing laws will ever make any difference to these people!kgarner said:Not a technology per se, but I wish spam and spammers would be publically flogged. And then killed.
atszyman said:If I could I would get rid of the automated answering services where you actually have to speak to get them to advance. I am perfectly capable of pressing numbers on my handset to navigate the menu and it seems as though it would be far more accurate rather than
Me : "My Internet is down."
Them : "It sounded like you said 'My winter pet's a clown.'... transferring"
Me : "No, you daffy b******"
Them : "It sounded like you said 'Go to happy pastures.'... transferring"
.
.
.
and so on. If I managed to dial the number I can evidently hit the number keys to navigate. If I were incapable of doing that I couldn't have called in the first place...
How about one lashing per spam email sent?witness said:I fully agree (though maybe with little less of the killing), as if passing laws will ever make any difference to these people!
I agree with you there - in fact that was one of my complaints in an old Room 101 thread here some time back. It's as if you have to be speaking in a cone of silence so that no external noise gets through the receiver.atszyman said:If I could I would get rid of the automated answering services where you actually have to speak to get them to advance.
emw said:I agree with you there - in fact that was one of my complaints in an old Room 101 thread here some time back. It's as if you have to be speaking in a cone of silence so that no external noise gets through the receiver.
I have noticed on some that you can type the numbers instead of saying them, even if they don't specify that.friarbayliff said:I'll second that. I especially hate it when the system wants you to dictate code numbers to it (like serial numbers). It would be faster and far more accurate to just type the numbers in using the phone. I think they make the voice of the system happy and friendly just to make us angrier.
Lacero said:modulators and demodulators. so 20th century.