Tim, that is definitely the right course to take. Second only to the threat of Islam is the threat of the government, especially the USA, Russia and China. Thanks for taking the high road.
CNBC has a poll up on this. 50-50 split. This is no longer just a theoretical debate on privacy and security. And if the media (and politicians) is able to spin this as Apple siding with terrorists then I don't see how Apple wins in the court of public opinion. Is this a hill Tim Cook is willing to die on?
Isnt't comparing the development of Nuclear weapons and extracting data from a terrorist phone a bit too far fetched?
This is a battle they will lose, proving someone committed a crime is more important.
A bit alarming that we are relying on a corporation to protect our rights to privacy rather than the courts.
Tim Cook is a hypocrite. He'll use loopholes in tax law to save money but when a judge tells them to help the FBI, it is "a moment for discussion."
OR, maybe people should stop keeping "private" data on their smartphone if it's THAT important. Most (but unfortunately not all) people know the internet is not private and anywhere but inside your own house is not private. When I chose an iPhone (or any of my smartphones), knowing that my worthless texts and pictures were secure was not a deciding factor. I don't run out and buy an iPhone knowing that it's so safe, the government can't even access it. Now, there are those who do, but then, do they have something to hide in the first place? This type of thing only helps the criminals and terrorists.You keep making ridiculous comments.
So you would have Apple sacrifice everyone's freedom of privacy because you're scared of terrorists? Your fear is the desired response of terrorism.
Just because there are some bad people out there in the world doesn't mean that we should all stop having our privacy.
What if they kill the dead guy again though?He's already dead.
Not sure what is patriotic about this. To me it is more a marketing move but maybe you can explain how not helping the authorities is patriotic.
True enough. I also would use pigeons to communicateIf, for some reason, I was trying to hide information, I would deinetly NOT use any piece of technology, a piece of paper can be burned / eaten much faster, better yet spoken words , anyone could have said that, and you can't proove anything
never mind. close minded people never remember things that do not support their viewsDid you miss all the Snowden leaks? The govt will abuse the **** out of having a backdoor into iOS.
Needs more 'Merica.What if they kill the dead guy again though?
If Apple shows it has such tools, it can be legally compelled to give such tools to the FBI. It's not gonna happen.OR, maybe people should stop keeping "private" data on their smartphone if it's THAT important. Most (but unfortunately not all) people know the internet is not private and anywhere but inside your own house is not private. When I chose an iPhone (or any of my smartphones), knowing that my worthless texts and pictures were secure was not a deciding factor. I don't run out and buy an iPhone knowing that it's so safe, the government can't even access it. Now, there are those who do, but then, do they have something to hide in the first place? This type of thing only helps the criminals and terrorists.
I'm on the fence about this topic because there are good arguments on both sides. CmdrLaForge, on the first page, made a good point. Why not hand Apple the phone, and let their engineers either unlock it or take the data off, and hand the FBI back either an unlocked phone, or a locked phone and the data requested by the FBI. No harm, no foul to humanity. If the information could keep America safe, and there are options other than a brick wall Tim Cook, then why not?
Sorry Tim , I think you draw the wrong line. Supporting terrorism is just plain wrong. Any righteous person has nothing to hide from the government...
For tax purposes, he says he follows the law. In this FBI story, Apple doesn't want to follow the law and ignore what the judge has ordered them to do.
Understand?
The thing is, on multiple occasions, including in Paris, authorities had access to unencrypted communications beforehand and failed to stop anything.If the photos, emails, documents, etc. on that device can potentially create another 9/11 (because terrorist can use the backdoor to get info from key personnel's stolen phone), wouldn't you want law enforcement to prevent it?
I'm on the fence about this topic because there are good arguments on both sides. CmdrLaForge, on the first page, made a good point. Why not hand Apple the phone, and let their engineers either unlock it or take the data off, and hand the FBI back either an unlocked phone, or a locked phone and the data requested by the FBI. No harm, no foul to humanity. If the information could keep America safe, and there are options other than a brick wall Tim Cook, then why not?
OR, would require a warrant from a judge in order to have a phone unlocked. Just like now, we have warrants for search and seizure against suspected criminals. Should those be outlawed also, because it invades the privacy of the suspected criminal?Needs more 'Merica.
If Apple shows it has such tools, it can be legally compelled to give such tools to the FBI. It's not gonna happen.
Any righteous person has nothing to hide from the government.
You don't get it. Fair enough.OR, would require a warrant from a judge in order to have a phone unlocked. Just like now, we have warrants for search and seizure against suspected criminals. Should those be outlawed also, because it invades the privacy of the suspected criminal?
How about America take a proactive approach and deal with the guns first?