It's a lie and it isn't IMO. They want to make revenue, and they intend to do that by making the best products they can because that's how they've done it in the past.
They want to make profit, which requires revenue, not revenue for it's own sake.
It's a lie and it isn't IMO. They want to make revenue, and they intend to do that by making the best products they can because that's how they've done it in the past.
If by market you mean consumers then I don't agree. I think we got 7" tablets because Amazon and Android OEM's knew the only way they could compete with iPad was on price.
Apple surely is, but it's not their top concern. Otherwise, my iMac would still be alive and not disassembled and its pieces shipped across the world.
"The most important thing to Apple is to make the best products in the world. We aren't interested in revenue for revenue's sake."
The bold part is the part I call unbelievable. The underlined part is the part I agree with.
"The most important thing to Apple is to make the best products in the world. We aren't interested in revenue for revenue's sake."
The bold part is the part I call unbelievable. The underlined part is the part I agree with.
It's a lie and it isn't IMO. They want to make revenue, and they intend to do that by making the best products they can because that's how they've done it in the past.
I think what he's saying is that the big overall question they ask when plan their business strategy is how do we make great products, rather than how do we make more money. That doesn't mean they don't want to make money also. Just that their business model isn't predicated on addressing that question first and foremost."The most important thing to Apple is to make the best products in the world. We aren't interested in revenue for revenue's sake."
The bold part is the part I call unbelievable. The underlined part is the part I agree with.
At the end of the day I think it was all about price. And 7" and decent enough quality gets them $199.If they knew the only way to compete with the iPad was to make 7" tablets, which are cheaper than bigger iPads, then they knew that the market wanted 7" tablets whether it be for the 7" screen or the lower price or both.
Apple responded with an iPad mini, which has a screen 40% bigger than the competitors' 7" tablets and costs more, and it sold well. Apple could have made cheap 7" tablets like its competitors.
Microsoft responded to Apple and its competitors (besides MSFT itself) with a PoS, as usual.
Just wish they offered better hardware in the MacBooks to justify the prices. I hate how they do the slow annual updates and bump up specs just by a bit. Or like with the iPad 1 not having a camera and putting it in the next gen. Like it was impossible to get a camera inside the 1st one And the iPad Mini not having retina...
I think what he's saying is that the big overall question they ask when plan their business strategy is how do we make great products, rather than how do we make more money. That doesn't mean they don't want to make money also. Just that their business model isn't predicated on addressing that question first and foremost.
And yet so many others think they have indeed made the best product ever, I count myself one of them.
Criteria are different for different people, they are neither universal nor absolute.
Sorry, I'm just so tired of this "the mini is crap because it's not retina" b***h fest that repeats more than a broken record.
It's not crap but it leaves a lot to be desired.
FYI- The current Gen 3 ATV is 1080P so maybe you should just get Gen2 on eBay?
Forget the remote in the box- use the Remote app for iPhone or iPad, so much better.
What you said is believable, and I agree with it. That's not what Cook said. The objective of Apple is to make money, and it does this by making great (typically the best) products.
----------
I have to DOWNSCALE the Apple TV to 720p to get it to work, ironically. Do you have a Sony Qualia projector, by chance?
Disagree completely. Where does that leave us now? Argue incessantly about a product, which I bought day one and have done nothing since except revel in said decision, with people who: 1) are disappointed with the mini (or my decision), 2) are severely disappointed (with either/both), 3) are utterly disappointed (with both) but will never be satisfied unless it craps Android chocolate buttons every time I press the home key, 4) feel superior in contradicting and being negative about just about everything on earth, 5) don't understand others have different criteria, 6) believe others are stupid simply for enjoying a product with about which they don't feel the same, or 7) all of the above?
iBored with discussing my lovely iPad mini with all of the above.
That famous Halo is dimming a bit, why are Mac sales lower than last year?
Can't be just iMac delays etc.
Can't it? And what about delays on the refresh of the Mini and the delay still ongoing for an update of the Pro? Last time the Mac Pro had anything done to it that a firmware flash didn't cover, was 2009! Four years!
In fact, on top of the extreme lateness of the updates and the extreme supply constraints in pushing out sales of them, the flat-out uncertainty over the future of the lines put a dark cloud over them. With Apple's fanatical attention to mobile and portable sectors, it seemed plausible that the Mac desktops would be EOLed or combined into some unified model. Given the wording of Tim Cook's "confirmation" of the Mac Pro refresh "later" this year, this possibility is in fact still in play...
The entire PC segment contracted sharply. Macs outperformed the sector overall. But Apple lost sales to self-inflicted wounds, for sure. They should have issued spec bumps in May or June and waited on the redesign until early 2013 when supply yields would have been in better shape.
Biggest lie ever.
Can't it? And what about delays on the refresh of the Mini and the delay still ongoing for an update of the Pro? Last time the Mac Pro had anything done to it that a firmware flash didn't cover, was 2009! Four years!
In fact, on top of the extreme lateness of the updates and the extreme supply constraints in pushing out sales of them, the flat-out uncertainty over the future of the lines put a dark cloud over them. With Apple's fanatical attention to mobile and portable sectors, it seemed plausible that the Mac desktops would be EOLed or combined into some unified model. Given the wording of Tim Cook's "confirmation" of the Mac Pro refresh "later" this year, this possibility is in fact still in play...
The entire PC segment contracted sharply. Macs outperformed the sector overall. But Apple lost sales to self-inflicted wounds, for sure. They should have issued spec bumps in May or June and waited on the redesign until early 2013 when supply yields would have been in better shape.
We're working on some incredible stuff. The pipeline is chock full. We feel great about what we've got in store.
Biggest lie ever.
Yeah, Tim Cook's quotes are never good ones.
It's easy to sit in the bleachers and throw rocks...
That is sadly the history of Apple.
Like why did we have to wait 5 years to get HDMI on any MAc?
A couple of posts before you said they do make the best products in the world. Which is it?
These are not mutually exclusive! It is 100% possible for Apple to think the the best way to make money is the bolded part of Cook's statement, thus making it the most important thing to Apple. They believe they will make less money if they cut corners on their products for the sake of revenues/profits.
I disagree. I think Apple's philosophy is that in order to profit they have to keep making the best products. I'm guessing your iMac broke down? Making the best products doesn't mean that no product will ever fail.
As Nunyabinez said, you need to learn how to read. It is what Cook said and what he and Apple believes. You wrote, "but a statement that they care about making good products and not money can't be credited." Nowhere did Cook say they didn't care about making money. He said "revenue for revenue's sake." That means they will not compromise product quality for the sole purpose of increasing revenue. Better reading comprehension please. Stop digging your hole...