Let's get this straight. HE proposes an accessory lens for a device that includes a camera. You propose a coffee machine, a hair dryer and a refrigerator. And HE is an idiot? (takes deep breath...)
Surely you can come up with a more persuasive argument than that. If you can't, maybe you should reconsider your position.
Call me a hypocrite, but if the buffoon and ambassador and hero for the cognitively challenged, Jeremy Clarkson, was marketing this camera, I be in boots and all. This idiot and his equally idiotic sidekicks are as Steve Coogan suggests just some school bullies.
Top Gear Offensive- Steve Coogan
By the way, have you heard the latest Kanye West album yet?
Ever heard of sarcasm ?
Let's tray again: Ford has issued a new add-on as well: a car; the only difference is that they simply call it a Ford with a iPhone car cradle.....you see where I am going?
This dude is the king of vaporware and self-promotion
His car company 'i.am.auto' consists of a 'thundervette' which is a combination of a 50's thunderbird and corvette and a delorean with a body kit, both of which were custom built by west coast customs, both of which are entirely impractical to mass produce. His staged theft of the Delorean during his album release was just a marketing ploy for a tracking device that wcc installed.
The real question is... Does it blend?
Tell that to Hasselblad users
Tell that to Hasselblad users
So you have to carry this extra 'camera' with you, but it only works when attached to the iPhone?
Why not just a standalone camera then?
Megapixels matter... but if you haven't the glass (lens) to support the megapixels, it's pretty much worthless. I highly doubt that will.i.am is going to be giving us Zeiss or even L-series quality glass. Also, sensor size is a big factor in quality of pics. None of which you will get from an iDevice. Attachment or no.
You mean the ones shooting with tripods, studio lighting, and a collection of lenses costing more than the camera itself, to produce images that will be subject to considerable digital manipulation, cropping, and enlargement for ultimate use on posters and in full-page, glossy magazine ads (i.e., in applications where megapixels can matter a great deal)?
Those more interested in specs than photography might find it interesting to note that the iPhone 5 camera's sensor already packs more pixels per unit area than the (considerably larger) sensor in a 50 megapixel, 30 kilobuck Hasselblad, and, somewhat less disingenuously if equally irrelevantly, that the iPhone 5 touchscreen is significantly sharper than the camera's display, which, at 3 inches and "230k" (320*240*#{red,green,blue}) is on par with displays available in non-touchscreen contemporaries of the original iPhone.
Agreed. I've got my DSLR if I want to carry another camera with me.
funny thing is, most of you would buy this is it was an official Apple product/
I'm getting tired of my crappy iPhone Camera. I need to get a cannon or something that will take amazing pics.
You do realise I was just being jovially sarcastic and in no way meant it in the depth of thought that you clearly have warranted the post in needing
We have a Hasselblad lenses and digital back 50 mega pixel monster in our studio, its makes the amount of photoshop work needed after to touch people up a royal pain because it captures every single pore and flaw regardless of how well lit the subject is or how much makeup they have plastered on, and the file sizes after a shoot are the stuff of nightmares.
You mean the ones shooting with tripods, studio lighting, and a collection of lenses costing more than the camera itself, to produce images that will be subject to considerable digital manipulation, cropping, and enlargement for ultimate use on posters and in full-page, glossy magazine ads (i.e., in applications where megapixels can matter a great deal)?
Those more interested in specs than photography might find it interesting to note that the iPhone 5 camera's sensor already packs more pixels per unit area than the (considerably larger) sensor in a 50 megapixel, 30 kilobuck Hasselblad, and, somewhat less disingenuously if equally irrelevantly, that the iPhone 5 touchscreen is significantly sharper than the camera's display, which, at 3 inches and "230k" (320*240*#{red,green,blue}) is on par with displays available in non-touchscreen contemporaries of the original iPhone.