I'm guessing you've never tried to write and manage citations for a 150 page grant on an ipad.
Same goes to rMB. We will see how it performs.
I'm guessing you've never tried to write and manage citations for a 150 page grant on an ipad.
They do completely different things. I wouldn't be able to use an iPad as my primary computer for even half of what I do.
----------
I'm going to use the rMB to get actual work done. Sorry to disappoint you.
Well obviously an iPad can't be used as a primary machine, but a dual-core computer with a 1.2GHz processor (that is basically a glorified netbook) starting at $1300 is just not a good investment really. At that price range, the 13" Pro Retina makes much more sense.
Its called an iPad Air 2. Every bit as fast if not faster. Lighter and half the price. I dont get how this is some ultimate MB for email and web browsing....this isnt 2008 anymore. An iPad can do all that in a smaller, lighter, cheaper package. The new MB will run most productivity apps like garbage anyway. So "getting work done" means email and internet. icloud photo library lets you manage on any device as does Lightroom mobile. Forget about doing any video editing on the MB. So whats that leave? Once again....internet and email. Dont need to spend 1299 to do that. This is the Apple Watch Edition of laptops....totally unnecessary
I'm guessing you've never tried to write and manage citations for a 150 page grant on an ipad.
I'm guessing you've never tried to write and manage citations for a 150 page grant on an ipad.
I can't even begin to tell you how completely wrong you are...
I've done stuff like that on an iPad after Sandy. I'd almost rather have my wisdom teeth pulled without anesthesia. Utterly hideous.
Or you can get a MB pro which can do actual heavy computing tasks. Or an air for cheaper and still beats the tar out of the MB.
So please tell me how I'm wrong in the fact the new MB is nothing more than a bragging piece for that price. Once again, it's not 2008 where MacBooks weigh 5 or 6 pounds. The original air was an overpriced piece of metal, this is no different. It's a repeat of 2008. In two years it'll be worth buying for the masses.
You're not wrong. You're right. About everything. Always.
There... Is that what you need to hear? Is that enough to satisfy your reason for posting? Can you be quiet now?
Same goes to rMB. We will see how it performs.
im guessing you never tried pairing a bluetooth keyboard to an ipad......
So you'll have to carry around an extra bluetooth keyboard? Either a sturdy full size one you'll have to connect on and off and change batteries etc, or a cheap fold over one. Either way it can't be compared to a real laptop.Im guessing you never tried pairing a Bluetooth keyboard to an iPad......
It's not about being right or wrong, it's about someone making a compelling point for spending 1299 on 3 year old technology for the sake of having the thinnest notebook. The only argument I've read on here is having a keyboard attached. There's no solid justification other than that.
Debate, don't be childish.
It's not about being right or wrong, it's about someone making a compelling point for spending 1299 on 3 year old technology for the sake of having the thinnest notebook. The only argument I've read on here is having a keyboard attached. There's no solid justification other than that.
Debate, don't be childish.
Childish is putting yourself in position to judge the desires, perspectives and preferences of others, and then arrogantly demanding that they supply sufficient argumentation ("debate") to satisfy your self-defined superior perspectives.
We all get that you think the rMB is a poor value choice, and that feel that you are far too intelligent and mature to purchase one.
All your rhetoric and argumentativeness comes off as arrogant and judgmental, which is a common trait of petulant narcissists. "Debate, don't be childish" is simply projection and diversion.
You're better off just being quiet, making your own decision and respecting other people to make theirs.
I've travelled with my 13" macbook from 2008. I much rather not travel with a computer that big. Yes, I can physically carry it, but if you're doing intercontinental travel and you don't want to bring too much with you because you already have a lot to bring and you're lugging your computer from place to place after that, it makes sense.
I have a computer at home and work for data analysis. I just need this one for writing/presentations and other basic stuff. MBA would do just fine as well if it weren't for the screen and the boost in processor FOR WHAT I'D BE DOING WITH IT doesn't matter.
I don't drive an SUV because I don't need the room. I don't buy computers with extra space/weight because I DON"T NEED IT. I BUY ACCORDING TO MY NEEDS and I need light weight and OSX with nice screen preferred.
Anyone who thinks that the lowly, insignificant and unprofessional work that's done with Excel or Word is not real work - or that it can't be done as well on the rMB as on a 13" rMBP or MBA - or underestimates the difference between trying to do this work on an iOS device and doing the same thing on an OS X machine - is really out of touch with reality.
This is a discussion forum.....but thanks for the advice doctor. Of course calling people names makes you even wiser. The rest of us will keep to the topic at hand.
Anyone who thinks that the lowly, insignificant and unprofessional work that's done with Excel or Word is not real work - or that it can't be done as well on the rMB as on a 13" rMBP or MBA - or underestimates the difference between trying to do this work on an iOS device and doing the same thing on an OS X machine - is really out of touch with reality.
We don't all do the same kind of "professional work," do we? Many people (I might even venture to say "most") don't work in fields that demand the kind of storage, connectivity and CPU/GPU power offered by power/pro-line computers like the rMBP lineup. I've said it before - Lawyers, accountants, teachers, professors, students, doctors, medical professionals, journalists, writers, pastors, salespersons, CEOs, executives, bankers, pilots, law-enforcement, military, etc., etc... are all Professionals who don't need more power than what is offered by the new Macbook.
^THIS. Thanks.
We don't all do the same kind of "professional work," do we? Many people (I might even venture to say "most") don't work in fields that demand the kind of storage, connectivity and CPU/GPU power offered by power/pro-line computers like the rMBP lineup. I've said it before - Lawyers, accountants, teachers, professors, students, doctors, medical professionals, journalists, writers, pastors, salespersons, CEOs, executives, bankers, pilots, law-enforcement, military, etc., etc... are all Professionals who don't need more power than what is offered by the new Macbook. We all make up a large segment of the marketing target for a computer exactly like the new rMB.
And anyone who has tried to do any serious writing on an iOS device knows - it's no match at all for a computer running a full OS. I crank out 5,000-6,000 words a week, every week, and once tried to do the bulk of my work from an iPad. There's no way at all it's adequate. A full OS and full sized keyboard is necessary, as is a full-blown computer without touch-screen requirements for selecting text, copy-paste, etc...
----------
Nice dodge... and nice try. I'm not a doctor.
Keep ranting and trying to prove everyone wrong if that makes you happy. But it's probably best if you admit - at least to yourself - that doing what you're doing isn't the same thing as "discussion."
Discussion is objective, dispassionate, impersonal and respectful of the other parties' perspectives and opinions. What you're doing is condescending and communicates a critical air of judgmental superiority.
No names were called. Narcissism isn't a name. It's a descriptor of people who make a habit of criticizing others for the sake of demonstrating their own superiority. It's rampant on these forums.
They buy Surface Pro 3s Runs a full OS and its lighter, more powerful and cheaper than the MacBook. Back in 2008 the Air worked because the competition was still making big, heavy laptops or awful netbooks. Times have changed and Microsoft, Dell and Asus all have very nice competition that's chepaer, more powerful and just as well built.
They buy Surface Pro 3s Runs a full OS and its lighter, more powerful and cheaper than the MacBook. Back in 2008 the Air worked because the competition was still making big, heavy laptops or awful netbooks. Times have changed and Microsoft, Dell and Asus all have very nice competition that's chepaer, more powerful and just as well built.
They buy Surface Pro 3s Runs a full OS and its lighter, more powerful and cheaper than the MacBook. Back in 2008 the Air worked because the competition was still making big, heavy laptops or awful netbooks. Times have changed and Microsoft, Dell and Asus all have very nice competition that's chepaer, more powerful and just as well built. If the new MacBook would have been closer to $1k, it would have been a massive hit despite its shortcomings. At $1300. It will remain a niche product for early adopters with money to burn while the majority wait for the better equipped and cheaper second generation.
all of which run Windows, which is not the preference of all people. Some prefer OS X, and are willing to pay more for it. Please don't be judgmental and call that segment stupid, foolish, materialistic, elitist, or whatever.
I agree and I prefer OSX to Windows too but let's be honest, the vast majority of the world uses Windows, it's not even close. Windows is improving while Mac is getting more resource hungry and problematic , it's like they are going in opposite directions from what they once were which I find interesting
They buy Surface Pro 3s Runs a full OS and its lighter, more powerful and cheaper than the MacBook. Back in 2008 the Air worked because the competition was still making big, heavy laptops or awful netbooks. Times have changed and Microsoft, Dell and Asus all have very nice competition that's chepaer, more powerful and just as well built. If the new MacBook would have been closer to $1k, it would have been a massive hit despite its shortcomings. At $1300. It will remain a niche product for early adopters with money to burn while the majority wait for the better equipped and cheaper second generation.
I agree and I prefer OSX to Windows too but let's be honest, the vast majority of the world uses Windows, it's not even close. Windows is improving and getting lighter while Mac is getting more resource hungry and problematic , it's like they are going in opposite directions from what they once were which I find interesting