Youtube should be able to work with Apple to provide the correct codec for iOS.Smarter way to obtain a 38% YouTube traffic reduction without affecting quality if Apple enables VP9 codec (2.68Mb VP9 vs 4.33Mb AVC @ 1080p).
View attachment 900122
Youtube should be able to work with Apple to provide the correct codec for iOS.Smarter way to obtain a 38% YouTube traffic reduction without affecting quality if Apple enables VP9 codec (2.68Mb VP9 vs 4.33Mb AVC @ 1080p).
View attachment 900122
Youtube should be able to work with Apple to provide the correct codec for iOS.
Sure, if google can pay Apple $9B they can make youtube consume less bandwidth in communicating with iOS devices.You're going to go to bat for Apple with FUD?
VP9 codec is license free and open source. It's readily available to download and compile for Darwin x86-64 and ARM platforms.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libvpx/+/master/README
Is streaming that important to people? Isn’t there other things people can think of doing...
Was sort of humorous yesterday. Turned on the TV, and for some reason the channel was reset to the Service Electric 2. Said it was High School Basketball but was just a black screen. Does this happen on all sports channels, or do they run past games?Great. Can't go out, can't meet with friends, TV is basically showing Corona 24/7, and now the internet streaming is **** as well.
Or why can't they modify the adaptive bit rate to be more aggressive and make it lower than it normally would.”virtue signaling” is a pejorative neologism, ie a made up word.
This reduction in resolution seems draconian, I don’t know why they didn’t try Peak/off-peak.
“The” definition of virtue signaling has nothing to do with your definition of virtue signaling. Yours includes a very weird “absence of proof” component.I've made it very clear what the definition of virtue signaling is. There's nothing generalized about it.
If mission essential teleconferencing, telemedicine and distance learning needs to happen, it should be done over a separate dedicated network channel to ensure sufficient capacity that isn't constricted by the general public internet. Why people would choose to have these critical activities over the general internet instead is truly the sign of money being spent on things that don't matter... like the marble lobby.
Yeah, there are those who want to stick it to “the man”.....But it’s great we’ve got concerned MR posters standing up for the average Joe. Hooray for the social justice warriors who keep the evil capitalist companies in check ?
Thank you for your anecdote! I surely hope it was hard numbers with proper analysis and not anectodes like yours that bent Netlfix and YouTube on this.
BTW I'm in the eastern EU and internet speed/latency in my house is as great as ever. Thanks for asking!
You're going to go to bat for Apple with FUD?
VP9 codec is license free and open source. It's readily available to download and compile for Darwin x86-64 and ARM platforms.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libvpx/+/master/README
Good move, no doubt some will cry about it but we know what sort of people they are.
This doesn’t make sense. If people work from home on their computers, it is no different than working from their office. Should be the same amount of bandwidth that is used because there is no one using the internet in the offices... may be I’m wrong
You’re not entitled to any data. If Netflix or YouTube or anyone else doesn’t think there’s a problem, they can say so. Working from home, telemedicine and distance learning is a higher priority than binge watching. Deal with it.
Reducing the bit rate makes sense, no matter how much it angers you. If ISPs need to block all streaming shows during work hours, they’ll do it. Hopefully it won’t come to that.
Why should anyone care what *you* would take. You're not involved in this in the slightest.. no one has to prove anything to you.
[automerge]1584724826[/automerge]
I'll see your single data point and raise you the data used by the entire city of Madrid:
“The” definition of virtue signaling has nothing to do with your definition of virtue signaling. Yours includes a very weird “absence of proof” component.
The actual definition of virtue signaling has nothing to do with any “proof” whatsoever. It’s a public act at little cost designed to let others know your socially acceptable traits. Filling out your dating profile with your favorite activities as hiking, reading and going to the gym is virtue signaling.
What’s ironic is your rants here are nothing more than virtue signaling. We get it. You’re fighting against the evil corporation slowing our internet because it’s easier than building out the needed capacity. They’ve chosen to build their marble lobby instead of building out more fiber connections to the internet exchange.
But it’s great we’ve got concerned MR posters standing up for the average Joe. Hooray for the social justice warriors who keep the evil capitalist companies in check ?
Do you really think spending a few (or few hundred) grand on a marble lobby has anything to do with the billions of dollars companies would need to spend to improve broadband internet? I think you’re missing the forest for the trees but you seem to be hung up on it so carry on ?♂️Virtue signaling is done in the absence of proof that it's actually doing anything. That's the whole point.
Your example of a dating profile isn't completely applicable here. If people are being sincere on a dating profile, and they genuinely enjoy those activities and look for them in a partner, that's not virtue signaling. If they're putting them down but don't actually enjoy them, then that's virtue signaling and they're being a phony.
Rants? Oh come on now. All the vanity projects companies do come at the expense of the product they're trying to sell. The marble lobby does nothing to improve the actual product and the essential basis for which it's actually sold. It's entirely worthless, but it has perceived value by the self-absorbed bubble of executives that didn't build the actual product they needed to. They see more value in a marble lobby than in a robust network. That's a shame.
I've never thought of myself as an SJW. I don't believe in pitchfork politics either. What I do believe is calling these phonies out for their failures and misplaced priorities. Was anyone at the company willing to say the marble lobby was a bad use of money when it could have gone into the network? If not, why not?