Obsolete? No. Value for money? Yes.
4. A small (5'6") opinionated person who likes the idea of £986 for a 13" MacBook Pro with:
I'd prefer 16 GB memory, but from experience (with 8 GB) I know that for my use case, storage is the bottleneck. So yesterday I spent a few minutes in IRC asking about what best to use for L2ARC, given the 8GB memory and other constraints.
I'd also prefer a larger integral display, but I nearly always use a peripheral.
Postscripts
I was happy with a 2006 13" display at home, at a weekend, at the beginning of February 2015.I might also try it at work tomorrow. Since then I have used the 2006 Mac twice at work, with and without a peripheral display (not particularly large). It's slow, but the display pleases me so it's increasingly likely that I'll go for the value for money option: a new 13" MacBook Pro without a Retina display.
Here is my very opinionated answer to this question. The baseline MBP is for:
1. People who are rich enough to overpay for an obsolete computer
2. People who are more conserved about mostly irrelevant upgradeability than about common sense
3. A very small group of people who have legitimate use for a slow but large-capacity magnetic storage
LOL! This made me laugh. It definitely is obsolete. …
4. A small (5'6") opinionated person who likes the idea of £986 for a 13" MacBook Pro with:
- 8 GB memory
- 1 TB storage, dual drive hybrid
- 128 GB SSD on USB 3, around 100 GB usable (around 28 GB given to the hybrid)
- integral optical drive, SuperDrive 8x
- Moshi Mini DisplayPort to HDMI Adapter (4K)
I'd prefer 16 GB memory, but from experience (with 8 GB) I know that for my use case, storage is the bottleneck. So yesterday I spent a few minutes in IRC asking about what best to use for L2ARC, given the 8GB memory and other constraints.
I'd also prefer a larger integral display, but I nearly always use a peripheral.
Postscripts
I was happy with a 2006 13" display at home, at a weekend, at the beginning of February 2015.
Last edited: