Actually no, that wasn't really intended as an insult. Yes, I meant that the Giants have more guys with major-league potential now than than in recent years, but I was really comparing to the Dodgers farm system turnaround. We went a long period where the prospects were traded away or didn't pan out. (Thank you, Kevin Malone.) Off the top of my head, Adrian Beltre is the only one I can think of from that era that was highly touted and stuck around in the majors for several years. The last few years the Dodgers farm system has done pretty well, ranked near the top for two or three years now. But it's easy to get impatient when the new guys that you've heard about finally come up to the show. I would say that the Dodgers' young guys are doing fairly well so far, but the team is still heavily dependent on free agents.
I realize now I wasn't explicit enough in my point: having good minor-leaguers doesn't mean they'll be good major-leaguers, and even if they are, it doesn't mean the team will win more games, much less contend.
Now here's my little insult to you, since you were waiting for it: maybe you're really, really hoping the young guys kick butt soon because if they don't, then a Giants team without Bonds' homers will suck big time?