Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple!Freak

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jan 11, 2005
545
0
East Coast
Is there really any noticable difference between the two? With only a 270Mhz difference, would you be able to notice much of anything?

Keep in mind both machines have 1GB of memory. (If that even matters? :confused: )
 
you'll notice a difference with Final Cut Pro, and other major graphics apps

for regular multitasking, I expect it to be the same
 
If time is absolutely essential to what you are doing (rendering, for example) then yes. Otherwise, there is not much difference.
 
UTB_Avid said:
apparently 270mhz is the difference between supporting a 30" display or not...

First of all, granted that I left engineering for psychology and my math skills have plummeted, but how does 1.67GHz - 1.5GHz = 270Mhz? :D

Second, IIRC, the 30" display deal has to do entirely with the change in video card. The latest 128MB video card supports the dual link display adaptor, and the other video cards do not. So it's that card that you need, and not 1.67GHz.
 
mkrishnan said:
First of all, granted that I left engineering for psychology and my math skills have plummeted, but how does 1.67GHz - 1.5GHz = 270Mhz? :D

Second, IIRC, the 30" display deal has to do entirely with the change in video card. The latest 128MB video card supports the dual link display adaptor, and the other video cards do not. So it's that card that you need, and not 1.67GHz.

ummm, oops :eek: . I was just quoting from the original post. Maybe I should do my own math from now on. :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.