I thought that 10.4.0 Tiger and 10.5.0 Leopard were a lot rougher around the edges when it was first released. I remember a few show stoppers when Tiger and Leopard came out where we couldn't integrate it into our work environment for months. Even though I have been using it for only a day now, 10.6.0 seems a great deal better off than when Tiger and Leopard launched. What do you think?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
10.4.0 and 10.5.0 vs. 10.6.0: Which was/ is more Polished at Release?
- Thread starter Marimoman
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I never had any "real" problems with Tiger or Leopard, but I'll let you know what I think when I get Snow Leopard.
Everybody's needs are different so you'll have some people who never experience the bugs as other people. Also, some things that people call bugs, other people call normal behavior... so who knows?
There's going to be things that I won't like, but I'll get used to them like I always do and I even begin to like them over time.