...think OSX seems to be running smoother with it? I just took the plunge and (fingers crossed), seem's to have gone well. I'm on a 2GHz MacBook 512RAM and OSX just seems much more slick. Anyone else or just wishful thinking?
mkrishnan said:It's funny that there are two threads on the new posts page right now, and one of them is a paean to how great 10.4.8 is, and the other a wailing dans macabre bemoaning it's ghoulishness.![]()
My experience has been that Tiger has been stable ever since 10.4.4 or so... and 10.4.7 and 10.4.8 are pretty equal, little cutenesses aside (like the ctrl-scroll thing!).
acidity said:Whats the (like the ctrl-scroll thing!). that you are talking about???
mkrishnan said:Holding the Ctrl key and doing a vertical scroll causes the screen to zoom in (up) or out (down, if not fully zoomed out). Then when the mouse hits the edge of the displayed portion of the screen, it scrolls over. It's basically for people with vision problems. For the rest of us, it's mostly cute.![]()
hector said:i think it was slightly better with 10.4.7 which it shipped with - not sure how to go back to that though
H
I use USB Overdrive and have my horizontal scroll set to zoom in/out, and it works just great. However, it would be nice not having to assign a mouse function to use it. I just haven't had the nerve yet to try 10.4.8 (I'll definitely do a clone first so that I can get back easily).mkrishnan said:Holding the Ctrl key and doing a vertical scroll causes the screen to zoom in (up) or out (down, if not fully zoomed out). Then when the mouse hits the edge of the displayed portion of the screen, it scrolls over. It's basically for people with vision problems. For the rest of us, it's mostly cute.![]()