Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

netdog

macrumors 603
Original poster
Feb 6, 2006
5,760
38
London
Seems like the last seed was more than a week ago. Wondering when we might see 10.4.9 seeded again or released?
 
well considering they seeded it, and then seeded it again. i'm guessing that they're still working on all the bugs. it hasn't been terribly long since it was seeded so perhaps a couple more weeks.

also this doesn't have to be the last update before. 10.5
 
OS 9.2 was released after OS X came out in 2001, so it's not entirely impossible that 10.4.9 is released after 10.5 (probably for interoperability fixes and such).
 
Why would they go 10.4.9.1 and not 10.4.10? The .9 has nothing to do with how close they are to the 10.5 release it is just the point release number of 10.4.
 
But 10.4.10... Thats just bad math! That's restarting at 10.4.1 (becuase adding the 0 after the 1 imo shouldn't change it mathematically). Yes I know the extra "." doesn't really qualify it as a true float.
Eh, I guess I need to stop trying to convince myself leopard is releasing soon.
 
But 10.4.10... Thats just bad math! That's restarting at 10.4.1 (becuase adding the 0 after the 1 imo shouldn't change it mathematically). Yes I know the extra "." doesn't really qualify it as a true float.
Eh, I guess I need to stop trying to convince myself leopard is releasing soon.

It's not bad math at all. That makes no sense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.