Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Jazwire

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 20, 2009
900
118
127.0.0.1
I have a 2011 17" I7 2.3 Quad, & a 2010 17" I7 2.66

It appears the 2011 models do not have the same size battery and it is indeed smaller.
According to "About this Mac"
2010 I7 - 17" - Full Charge Capacity - 12,576 (mAh)
2011 I7 - 17" Full Charge Capacity - 8,888 (mAh)

Unless there is another number or stat I should be looking at.
I am waiting for my 2010 to fully charge to see the battery life time is comparatively.

I will update as soon as it is done.
 

Erasmus

macrumors 68030
Jun 22, 2006
2,756
298
Australia
The Apple website says the new batteries are 95Wh. Which I'm sure is at the very least close to the old capacities.

Maybe the new batteries operate at a higher voltage, and hence hold less mAh?
 

The-Pro

macrumors 65816
Dec 2, 2010
1,453
40
Germany
i read somewhere that the battery in the 2010 17" runs at 7.9V (i think) and the 2011 17" battery at like 10.8V. dont know the exact voltages, i do think they are correct, i read this like 2 weeks back. so the batteries have the same overall capacity although the mAh is less. dont ask my why, or how this works, i dont get it :D
 
i read somewhere that the battery in the 2010 17" runs at 7.9V (i think) and the 2011 17" battery at like 10.8V. dont know the exact voltages, i do think they are correct, i read this like 2 weeks back. so the batteries have the same overall capacity although the mAh is less. dont ask my why, or how this works, i dont get it :D

Where the physics boffs at? Lol

All I can remember is ohms law V=IR

I'm just a humble anaesthetist
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.