Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

James.K.Polk

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 31, 2015
867
333
Really hung on this, and I've gone back and forth a number of times. I'd love to get a computer that lasts me 4-5 years. Use is not so strenuous - light photo editing, lots of PDFs and Word/Excel (and Mac equivalent) work. Sometimes 10-15 documents at once. Occasional 3D rendering but not enough (IMO) to warrant consideration.

I purchased a 13" MBP w/ TouchBar (base, 8 GB of RAM, 256 SSD) along with the LG UltraFine 4K and Apple "Magic" Peripherals. Cost was 2,710.44 after tax.

The alternative is a 15" MBP w/ TB (base) at a cost of $2,548.94 after tax.

With a differential of only $150, which of these "bundles" will take me more into the future?
 
Hard to tell, what is more future proof, without a crystal ball.

FWIW, I use the 4k UF LG and the 13". I also own a 2016 15"

The LG's creen is better than the laptops (if you can believe that). If you have the right percentage of time at the desktop there's that.
Get a Bookarc
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: James.K.Polk
I use the 4k UF LG and the 13". I also own a 2016 15"

The LG's creen is better than the laptops (if you can believe that). I would stick with that arrangement, if you have the right percentage of time at the desktop. The LG is super slick, with that single cable setup IMO.

Get a Bookarc for clamshell.

What does Bookarc do that just setting it on the desk not do? Just a space-saver?
 
15" is more future proof for sure.

Quad Core vs. Dual Core. Discrete Graphics vs. Integrated.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.