Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I guess, it depends what you are doing.
I prefer high resolution glossy.

MBP 2011, 15"
2.3GHz Quad-core Intel Core i78GB
1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x4GB
256GB Solid State Drive
Hi-Res Glossy Widescreen Display
AppleCare


RoyalFlush,
 
I'm a net nerd, not doing heavy photo/video editing, would like to play a few games on occasion like half life 2 or counter strike
 
MBP 17in
2.2GHz I7-2720QM 4GB
1333MHz DDR3 2x2GB
500GB HDD@7200rpm
Hi-Res Glossy Screen
Apple Care

Not enough for royal flush, but a straight flush
 
I first got the high-res glossy and after a few months of using it and then having the chance to use a 15" high-res anti-glare. I converted over.
It was so much more nicer for what I wanted to do; edit photos, movies and play games in whatever lighting environment im in.
Its just as vivid and bright but more of a true color instead of a popped out bright picture.

Neither are bad choices, but I think the Anti-glare non glass display is one of the best. IMPO
 
I like the matte

but

Too cheap

So I got the glossy instead.


If its real HD you will see it.


Looking on my PB its still shines but my eyes have adjusted to the glossiness of the MBP. Although the glossy screens on high end iMac look sick. A lot better than the MBPs. imo
 
Get the HD one if you use your MacBook Pro as your main computer. If you hook it up to a external display (like myself) you don't need the HD.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.