is it me or is mavericks eating memory? i'm running the same applications and my tasking has not changed since the update to 10.9 however i'm finding i'm always maxing out my 8gb like it's nothing.
What you should concern is Swap used. If it haven't touched Page files, your RAM is not really full then, just the way to manage RAM in Mavericks is different.![]()
What you should concern is Swap used. If it haven't touched Page files, your RAM is not really full then, just the way to manage RAM in Mavericks is different.![]()
is it me or is mavericks eating memory? i'm running the same applications and my tasking has not changed since the update to 10.9 however i'm finding i'm always maxing out my 8gb like it's nothing.
I believe the new memory compressed has correlation with "Page Outs" which doesn't exist in activity monitor anymore. But still, on my istat menu, i see this.View attachment 443407
However, the Swap Used is 0.
I think it's just a matter of algorithm. No big deal as long as no performance issues.
I'm just a bit annoyed by the look of it. LOL.
Wondering if you guys see the same?
Annoyed with the look of iStats?
SSDs have a higher read and write speed.Also noticed in Mavericks, the initial swap file size has increased from 64 MB to 1 GB. I haven't seen any good justification for this yet and was wondering if anyone had any insights.
SSDs have a higher read and write speed.
Can anyone tell me what the typical swap size should be? I just got my new rMBP with 8gb ram and running Mavericks. I just restarted and opened up Chrome. The only thing I've done is browse MacRumors and facebook and a few other sites and only in one tab. I just checked my activity monitor and it has used 248mb of swap![]()
My Mac Mini with 16gb of Ram on Mavericks hasn't touched the swap and I'm running Lightroom 5, Photoshop CC, Chrome and iTunes.
Ideal swap should always be 0.
I also got 7.99gb used finally. Not sure what happened. Maybe it was while downloading some apps from the apps store.
Image
But it never frees. Maybe I'm missing something. If I open 3 safari tabs and I close 1 tab isn't it supposed to clear some ram for the no longer open tab. Or is that not how it works. If I open 3 tabs in safari and close 1 it barely gives anything back.
Cleaning is a life saver. Because all 5 and ten add up. Every little extra that never comes back finally does after cleaning. If cleaning gives back 5gb of ram then something is wrong.
If it was all used then there is nothing to give back.
So if 5gb is coming back then that means if was sitting there wasted not being used. It was never being freed. It was obviously not needed in the first place. Because if it was needed badly then cleaning would not have released it.
That's correct it won't free all that ram because then if you were to open the same tab again for example it could be loaded instantly (or much quicker) because that information would still be stored in ram as opposed to re-fetching everything.
No, something is not wrong.
Not correct, because that's not how ram works.
Imagine it like your hard drive.
Would you rather:
A) Redownload every app you ever open from the web each time you want to use it and then trash it after each use
or
B) Save the app on your hard drive and open it right up whenever you need
Obviously you want to use B... Same thing applies to ram. You want as much information saved in ram as possible. There is ZERO benefit to having free ram because inactive ram can be purged and replaced with new info near instantaneously when needed. Therefore OSX leaves as much cached information as possible to save loading times when reopening things.
And what exactly do you think having 5GB of ram sitting doing nothing does for you lol?
"Clearing" your ram as well as cleaning caches will actually make your computer slower in most cases.