Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

benlangdon

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 13, 2008
1,497
0
ok so the new 17 in mbp has a screen at 1920 x 1200 resolution
that comes out to 133.19 pixels per inch.

that is a really really high number
so i was thinking, if someone got a second monitor to use next to it, and wanted it at the same resolution as the laptop, would it even be possible?

ive looked around a little bit, and at
2560 x 1600 (which is most 30in screens) you would have to get a 23in monitor that would be 131 pixels per inch.

im just wondering because, when i got a second monitor for my 15in mbp it was my main goal to get something with a similar resolution so when i work side by side things will be the same size. it took me a while to find a screen that matched the 15in mbp pixels per inch at 113 and the closest i could find was a 1680 x 1050 at 19in with a pixel per inch of 104.
 
Are you saying you want a 17'' with the same resolution, or just any sized monitor with the same resolution? A lot of 19'' sizes on up will do 1920x1200. Not sure what you're asking exactly
 
ya pretty much if there are screens that are 133 or similar pixels per inch.

they make 1920 x 1200 19in monitors?
 
Do you mean you want a monitor and a laptop with the same pixels per inch ratio?
 
Do you mean you want a monitor and a laptop with the same pixels per inch ratio?

well technically yes.
but the 17in mbp has such a high ppi i was wondering if they even have monitors with the same ppi.


o and i changed the name of this thread, for the 3rd time.
 
your prob not going to find anything close considering the highest 22" resolution on the market is 1080p (1920X1080). I wouldn't worry too much about it though extra screen space is screen space:D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.