B BillySpleen macrumors newbie Original poster Oct 17, 2008 4 0 Australia Oct 17, 2008 #1 Is it worth paying the extra money for the 2.8Ghz MBP for what I'm going to be doing (music production and a fair bit of Photoshop work)? Or will I be ok using the 2.53Ghz?
Is it worth paying the extra money for the 2.8Ghz MBP for what I'm going to be doing (music production and a fair bit of Photoshop work)? Or will I be ok using the 2.53Ghz?
ntrigue macrumors 68040 Jul 30, 2007 3,805 4 Oct 17, 2008 #2 How much more? That 2.8 is gonna be blazing fast. iMac replacement.
R radx macrumors newbie Oct 16, 2008 28 0 Oct 17, 2008 #3 Since they are both 35w (turns out 2.53 is T9400 and not P9500) I settled on 2.8 one.
B BillySpleen macrumors newbie Original poster Oct 17, 2008 4 0 Australia Oct 17, 2008 #4 ntrigue said: How much more? That 2.8 is gonna be blazing fast. iMac replacement. Click to expand... Here in Australia it's an extra AU$480. Not sure what that is in US$
ntrigue said: How much more? That 2.8 is gonna be blazing fast. iMac replacement. Click to expand... Here in Australia it's an extra AU$480. Not sure what that is in US$
R radx macrumors newbie Oct 16, 2008 28 0 Oct 17, 2008 #5 BillySpleen said: Here in Australia it's an extra AU$480. Not sure what that is in US$ Click to expand... It's 300$ more in both Canada and US.
BillySpleen said: Here in Australia it's an extra AU$480. Not sure what that is in US$ Click to expand... It's 300$ more in both Canada and US.