Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

2011 MBA SSD more power then needed?

Oppressed

Oppressed

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Aug 15, 2010
1,265
10
Based on the newest rumor of the new MBA containing SSD capable of outputting 400MBps:

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/04/next-macbook-air-to-adopt-faster-more-power-efficient-ssd/

Got me to thinking, would the everyday user even see the difference in speed? And if any difference is perceived then is it more based on the newer chipset than the SSD?

Or was this purely implemented to eliminate the slowdown caused by Lion's encryption function?

Also, somewhat off topic question, as SSD approach RAM speeds could we see the elimination of RAM all together?
 
Faster speeds allow good code writers to be spectaular, and sloppy ones to get away with murder....just ask microsoft about the latter....lol
 
Oppressed said:
Based on the newest rumor of the new MBA containing SSD capable of outputting 400MBps:

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/04/next-macbook-air-to-adopt-faster-more-power-efficient-ssd/

Got me to thinking, would the everyday user even see the difference in speed? And if any difference is perceived then is it more based on the newer chipset than the SSD?

Or was this purely implemented to eliminate the slowdown caused by Lion's encryption function?

Also, somewhat off topic question, as SSD approach RAM speeds could we see the elimination of RAM all together?
Click to expand...

I would say no on the combining RAM.

RAM is volatile meaning that when the power is cut (turning off the computer) the memory is cleared.

The flash used in SSDs is non volatile meaning that it can retain its data with no power.
 
reclusive46 said:
I could but wrong but I think essentially thats what an SSD is.
Click to expand...

Haha. Wait were you being funny?

I mean as in, why can't RAM be like an SSD, if this were the case? A few posts up someone asked about RAM being used with flash but that wouldn't work. What I'm wondering is why can't RAM be like flash memory?

Unless it's just... not made to be that. As in, it isn't in the code itself for RAM and the entire machine as a whole to work in the way that I'm suggesting. Doesn't really matter to me though as I never need more than 4 gigs. Just some food for thought :)
 
Oppressed said:
Based on the newest rumor of the new MBA containing SSD capable of outputting 400MBps:

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/04/next-macbook-air-to-adopt-faster-more-power-efficient-ssd/

Got me to thinking, would the everyday user even see the difference in speed? And if any difference is perceived then is it more based on the newer chipset than the SSD?

Or was this purely implemented to eliminate the slowdown caused by Lion's encryption function?

Also, somewhat off topic question, as SSD approach RAM speeds could we see the elimination of RAM all together?
Click to expand...

The article claimed that it would output 400Mbs, not 400MBs. 400 megabits per second. Also SSDs and RAM do different tasks.
 
Oppressed said:
Based on the newest rumor of the new MBA containing SSD capable of outputting 400MBps:

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/04/next-macbook-air-to-adopt-faster-more-power-efficient-ssd/

Got me to thinking, would the everyday user even see the difference in speed? And if any difference is perceived then is it more based on the newer chipset than the SSD?

Or was this purely implemented to eliminate the slowdown caused by Lion's encryption function?

Also, somewhat off topic question, as SSD approach RAM speeds could we see the elimination of RAM all together?
Click to expand...

SSD are not approaching RAM speeds, RAM is getting further away from SSDs.
 
leftywamumonkey said:
The article claimed that it would output 400Mbs, not 400MBs. 400 megabits per second. Also SSDs and RAM do different tasks.
Click to expand...

its the same thing just a capital letter...............................................................................................................................................................................
 
MilkMan4 said:
its the same thing just a capital letter...............................................................................................................................................................................
Click to expand...

Technically one means 400 megabits per second, the other means 400 megs... total. Which is technically wrong. Of course i don't really care; as you stated it is a capital letter, however it kind of changes the meaning.
 
Actually, the article did mention 400Mb/s, as someone stated above me, wich is not impressive at all (50MB/s), but some others articles mentioned 400MB/s... By the way, still with 400MB/s, it would be painfully slow to use it as RAM, simce RAM has speed of x(x)GB/s... Not to mention SSD isn't suitable for similar usage since it still has wear level.
 
Oppressed said:
Based on the newest rumor of the new MBA containing SSD capable of outputting 400MBps:

https://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/04/next-macbook-air-to-adopt-faster-more-power-efficient-ssd/

Got me to thinking, would the everyday user even see the difference in speed? And if any difference is perceived then is it more based on the newer chipset than the SSD?

Or was this purely implemented to eliminate the slowdown caused by Lion's encryption function?

Also, somewhat off topic question, as SSD approach RAM speeds could we see the elimination of RAM all together?
Click to expand...

Combined with faster processors - this could mean serious competition for the 13" MBP (but nobody will know until it's out. Rumors are the consolation price for a lack of information).
 
MilkMan4 said:
its the same thing just a capital letter...............................................................................................................................................................................
Click to expand...

Megabits and megabytes are not the same thing.
 
Nostromo said:
Combined with faster processors - this could mean serious competition for the 13" MBP (but nobody will know until it's out. Rumors are the consolation price for a lack of information).
Click to expand...

The MBP still uses full voltage chips. They will probably still out perform the LV and ULV versions of the same chip despite of the SSD.
 
Personally I would rather keep memory separate from disk. Something about reserving portions of disk as memory just seems wasteful. And limits expansion.
 
400 MB/s is on par with some of the new SATA III drives out there like the Crucial m4 and Vertex 3's. It's definitely nice but not Earth shattering exciting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back