H hwall macrumors newbie Original poster Jan 6, 2011 12 0 Feb 24, 2011 #1 Score of 10942 for the 2.2ghz click here
stockscalper macrumors 6502a Aug 1, 2003 917 235 Area 51 Feb 24, 2011 #2 hwall said: score 10942 for the 2.2ghz here Click to expand... Means nothing. Those tests are designed to take advantage of the quad core, whereas in real life you'll hardly ever find software that does.
hwall said: score 10942 for the 2.2ghz here Click to expand... Means nothing. Those tests are designed to take advantage of the quad core, whereas in real life you'll hardly ever find software that does.
H hoxley macrumors regular Jan 19, 2011 127 0 Feb 24, 2011 #3 stockscalper said: Means nothing. Those tests are designed to take advantage of the quad core, whereas in real life you'll hardly ever find software that does. Click to expand... Logic. The current version. The next version of FCP. both of the above are also 64 bit.
stockscalper said: Means nothing. Those tests are designed to take advantage of the quad core, whereas in real life you'll hardly ever find software that does. Click to expand... Logic. The current version. The next version of FCP. both of the above are also 64 bit.
E egglybagelface macrumors newbie Feb 8, 2011 17 0 Feb 24, 2011 #4 Maybe I'm reading something wrong, but it looks like the 2.2ghz processor is better than the 2.3ghz?? 10942 vs 9379. http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360231 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360268
Maybe I'm reading something wrong, but it looks like the 2.2ghz processor is better than the 2.3ghz?? 10942 vs 9379. http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360231 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360268
L lesyork macrumors member Jan 31, 2011 57 0 Feb 24, 2011 #5 egglybagelface said: Maybe I'm reading something wrong, but it looks like the 2.2ghz processor is better than the 2.3ghz?? 10942 vs 9379. http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360231 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360268 Click to expand... 2.3GHz test run in 32-bit Geekbench test.
egglybagelface said: Maybe I'm reading something wrong, but it looks like the 2.2ghz processor is better than the 2.3ghz?? 10942 vs 9379. http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360231 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/360268 Click to expand... 2.3GHz test run in 32-bit Geekbench test.