Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

brianmonty

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 26, 2008
11
3
I was in the market for a new Mac to replace my mid-2010 27” iMac.

I ordered a mini days before the new iMac was released and then ordered a 2017 refurbished iMac but changed my mind and purchased a 2019 iMac.

I am keeping the 2019 and have returned the mini and 2017.

But, while I had all 3 machines, I did some benchmarking to compare them. I am not proficient with computers, just dangerous enough to wipe a machine clean by accident.

I timed the restart time and black-magic write speed of the 3 machines (also my current 2010).

Since I had some extra memory with both machines on my desk, I also added ram to the 2019 to see how the additional ram impacted the results.

See below for the results...

Screen Shot 2019-04-05 at 1.56.20 PM.png


Note that the 2017 and mini where basically blank computers with just the operating system. The 2019, I transferred some of my data and set up a few accounts. This may be why the 2019 is slightly slower than the 2017. Or it could be the slightly lower speed of the processor as I believe the additional cores are better for complex operations but higher GHz for standard.

I decided on the 2019, mostly because for $250 I get a newer processor, slightly better graphics card and hopefully another year or two of updates to the operating system.

I know the RAM is not optimized because of the different speeds, and it looks like that when I installed the 2400 everything went down to 2400.

While I was at it, I did some speed tests with 2 external drives I have.
2TB usb a with spinning HD
1TB SSD connected via usb a and usb c.
Screen Shot 2019-04-05 at 1.59.27 PM.png


USB C is about 12% faster than USB A.

SSD blows spinning HD out of the water.

Hope this helps anyone else trying to make a decision on what to purchase.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.