Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

81Tiger04

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Aug 11, 2009
465
37
SC
How does the new MBP 16” compare in size to the 2016 14”? I get that the screen size is bigger. But how does it compare in footprint? The bezel is smaller so I’m guessing they may be about the same?

Or am I way off?
 
How does the new MBP 16” compare in size to the 2016 14”? I get that the screen size is bigger. But how does it compare in footprint? The bezel is smaller so I’m guessing they may be about the same?

Or am I way off?
They are similar, although the 16-inch model is a bit larger and heavier. Look at the specs taken from Apple's website:

15.4-inch MacBook Pro (2016)

Height: 0.61 inch (1.55 cm)
Width: 13.75 inches (34.93 cm)
Depth: 9.48 inches (24.07 cm)
Weight: 4.02 lbs (1.83 kg)


16.2-inch MacBook Pro (2021)

Height: 0.66 inch (1.68 cm)
Width: 14.01 inches (35.57 cm)
Depth: 9.77 inches (24.81 cm)
Weight: 4.7-4.8 lbs (2.1-2.2 kg)

 
  • Like
Reactions: 81Tiger04
Thanks. This helps firm up my decision … Since I doubt I’ll notice the ever so slight increase in size, the 16” it is!
 
I had the 2016 15" a while back and am now using the 16.2". It does feel and look substantially bigger because the sides aren't tapered but the footprint is similar as seen above.
 
I had the 2016 15" a while back and am now using the 16.2". It does feel and look substantially bigger because the sides aren't tapered but the footprint is similar as seen above.
Yeah I agree, it is substantially "chunkier", because of the more block-ish size. You should feel it for yourself in-store
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.