This is really weird... I've never heard anything like it but it's on MSNBC so it's true... or it could have been a massive hoax...
Woe! Lake Begone!
Woe! Lake Begone!
David Taylor, a geologist who inspected the lakebed Wednesday, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that the sinkhole was formed when water eroded the limestone deep underground and created pockets in the rock. The sinkhole was like a ticking time bomb.
LOL!Oirectine said:Oh, uh, sorry everybody. I was... really thirsty.![]()
HmmmmBy Wednesday, the manmade lake normally seven to 10 feet deep in spots had been reduced to a mucky, stinky mess.
It also was a feature in the Engineering Disasters on TLC or the Discovery Channel, quite interesting pictures/video of the land getting sucked into a hole and the water shooting back up the salt mine entrance.Counterfit said:Anyways, something similar happened before. I don't remember all the detail from the case study in my Engineering by Design book, but I believe the lake was located in Louisiana, and it was quite large. Texaco was drilling some test holes to find oil that was known to be there. There also happened to be a salt mine underneath said lake. Well, someone at Texaco didn't compare their maps to that of the mine company, and they drilled right into the mine. No on died, but the mine became unusable, and it took quite a while for the lake to fill back up.
David Taylor, a geologist who inspected the lakebed Wednesday, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that the sinkhole was formed when water eroded the limestone deep underground and created pockets in the rock. The sinkhole was like a ticking time bomb.
King Cobra said:Link doesn't work (i.e. page won't load). I tried opening it in Mozilla, and nothing from the page loaded into my window. Then I tried it in Safari, and I got this (click on the attachment, ya lazy bums):
Mozilla - doesn't work.Frohickey said:Worked for me... link
Funny, worked under Mozilla 1.7b for me.King Cobra said:Mozilla - doesn't work.
Safari - doesn't work.
Internet Exploder - WTF? Now it works?! Bah, I hate I.E.
Man, it would have been cool to see the "funnel" as the lake dropped.
Anyways...oh, no. Chemistry equilibrium equations.![]()
King Cobra said:Link doesn't work (i.e. page won't load). I tried opening it in Mozilla, and nothing from the page loaded into my window. Then I tried it in Safari, and I got this (click on the attachment, ya lazy bums):
PowerMacMan said:Because the lake is private property, the subdivisions residents will have to cover the cost of fixing it, probably through special property assessments. George English expects it to cost $1,000 a household.
absolut_mac said:Personally, I think that the $1,000 will more than make up for any loss in property value if they leave it as a mucky stinky mess!
Period, not a question mark (or three).sonyrules said:If they do fix it, I wonder how long it would take to fill it again???
King Cobra said:I wouldn't be worried about how long it'll take to fill it. The big issues are cost (as referenced before) and the productivity of filling the "hole" on our economy. I estimate that the 23-acre lake averaging 4 feet deep can hold about 30 million gallons of water. Given that Poland Springs ships their gallons of water at 85c/gallon, then awards a 10% additional sale, you're talking about $23 million in filling that thing up. And those 52 foot semi-s can hold no more than 7000 gallons of water each, given that each one was sealed off like an aquarium. So you're talking about over 4000 trucks going to the site to fill that thing up. That's very time consuming and (can be debated) not a productive use of our resources.
King Cobra said:That's very time consuming and (can be debated) not a productive use of our resources.
Because in order to deliver all that water, you would need lots of trucks to bring lots of water over, and all that water could be used for other purposes, like preparing an aquarium in New York to attract people in ordert o bring in money, etc. Point is: Don't bring trucks to the lake...let the lake stay dry to save the cost of filling it up. Not to mention, Mr. A claimed that "There won't be any water trucks showing up...."Frohickey said:Are you part of the homeowners that live around this 23 acre lake?
If you are not, why is it 'our' resources, and 'our' economy?
There is no "Vacuum of Infinite Density" going on. Instead, that was your annoying cocky attitude and a reference to an inside joke that has no application here. I said that the time and cost of filling up the lake again via trucks would not be a productive use of our economical resources, and I feel that I have showed that further with the example of the NY aquarium (above in this post). Thus, I feel that I have demonstrated that refilling the lake up with trucks is not a great solution to replace 30 million gallons of water. What Mr. A suggested (let rain fill it up) would work (eventually); however, my focus was on how to fill up the lake quickly, as in, much quicker than it takes mother nature to fill it up again.Mr. Anderson said:They must have had one of your Vacuums of Infinite Density working there.