iMacZealot said:Could someone please tell me why you'd spend $250 for a nano that holds 2K songs when you can get a 6G iPod video that holds 7,500 and does movies. I just don't understand that unless if it's the size that's tempting, but this makes less sense than when the mini/nanos were $250 and the big iPod was $300.
mad jew said:I'd always get the Flash-based iPod because I use it for running and the hard drive based iPods don't last as well. They're more vulnerable to small freezes from the jolting and they rarely last longer than eight months for me.![]()
Black -- no choice if I want 8GB.Ubuntu said:Thanks to Johnny Quest for the idea! Thought I'd pollify it.
What colour is your nano? Or what colour are you going to order?
iMacZealot said:Could someone please tell me why you'd spend $250 for a nano that holds 2K songs when you can get a 6G iPod video that holds 7,500 and does movies. I just don't understand that unless if it's the size that's tempting, but this makes less sense than when the mini/nanos were $250 and the big iPod was $300.
Good points.Fotograffiti said:It's all about the size. A lot of people don't care if their iPod plays movies. The Nano is more convenient to put in your pocket or to work out with. I would rather have the small form factor of the Nano seeing as I would rarely ever sit and watch video on my ipod anyway. And I can be perfectly happy carrying around 8 GBs worth of music at any given time.
n-abounds said:However, I have a kinda broken iPod Mini 1G in GOLD. Now if they released a Nano in GOLD...I'd buy it in a sec. Gold was so original- no one owned it. But it wasn't an ugly gold, it was kinda a bronzy-gold. Loved it, want it back.
I use it for running, it's smaller, and now the exterior is much more durable than the larger iPod. I have 70 GB of music, but I love smart playlists, and I'll refresh music on my nano every week or so, so it works out in the end.iMacZealot said:Could someone please tell me why you'd spend $250 for a nano that holds 2K songs when you can get a 6G iPod video that holds 7,500 and does movies. I just don't understand that unless if it's the size that's tempting, but this makes less sense than when the mini/nanos were $250 and the big iPod was $300.