I mean though no wide screen the Airs screen is better for space than the MBP.
I meant to write 16:10, my bad.
I mean though no wide screen the Airs screen is better for space than the MBP.
I mean though no wide screen the Airs screen is better for space than the MBP.
The MacBook Air has the same aspect ratio. It is widescreen. You are confused.
The MacBook Air has the same aspect ratio. It is widescreen. You are confused.
Air : 1366x768 (native)
Pro : 1280x800 (native)
The Air has widescreen the MBP doesn't the screen seems far more box like than the Air.
Air : 1366x768 (native)
Pro : 1280x800 (native)
The Air has widescreen the MBP doesn't the screen seems far more box like than the Air.
On the Air your windows have far more space on screen on the MBP with the same windows it's boxed in and the same things don't fit.
1366/768 = 1.77
1280/800 = 1.6
4/3 = 1.33
Both 1.6 and 1.77 would be considered wide screen in this context. Anything significantly larger than 1.33 would. Your basic premise does not make any sense.
Air : 1366x768 (native)
Pro : 1280x800 (native)
The Air has widescreen the MBP doesn't the screen seems far more box like than the Air.
On the Air your windows have far more space on screen on the MBP with the same windows it's boxed in and the same things don't fit.
Yes that doesn't look good next to the Air.Smaller resolution does not mean it isn't widescreen. And 16:10 will have more height than 16:9, making it slightly more "box like".
I admit making an initial error on the term widescreen and typing 4:3 when I meant 16:10 but the issue I was trying to bring up is apps look better on that 16:9 aspect ration next to the MBP, the content is box like and squashed.I was comparing the 13" version of both laptops. Didn't notice the 11.6" in your original post. 16:10 is still considered widescreen.
The Air has the wider native screen resolution and with that you can fit more apps on screen and they also look less box like. I can load the twitter client on both and it looks thiner and better on the air if I load it on the MBP, if I try to re size it to be as thin as on the Air the content is squashed.
I admit making an initial error on the term widescreen and typing 4:3 when I meant 16:10 but the issue I was trying to bring up is apps look better on that 16:9 aspect ration next to the MBP, the content is box like and squashed.
I'm going to have to take pictures to show you guys.That doesn't make any sense. What does the aspect ratio of the display have to do with the shape and content in your apps?
I'm just going to have to start to use spaces...a feature I've never gotten into the habit of using...Most programs, websites, and documents are vertical oriented. Now if you want two programs side by side, a wider screen will help with that, but you're talking about a 13" screen anyway.
I'm just going to have to start to use spaces...a feature I've never gotten into the habit of using...
I do want things side by side.
Tell me about it I've got a 27" iMac - lolThen in my opinion, a 11" - 13" screen isn't very practical to begin with.
Tell me about it I've got a 27" iMac - lol