Earlier Core 2 Duo machines can recognize a potential 3.3 GB (with 2 x 2 GB installed... the top 700 MB is wasted, so the practical maximum is 3 Gb with 1 x 1 Gb and 1 x 2 Gb). This is a hardware limitation.
* With 4 GB installed, these machines will report 4 GB in System Profiler, but the operating system will only use 3.3 GB.
It was my understanding that MacBooks (not pros) could only do 2x1gb or 2x512mb. So can my macbook do 1x1gb + 1x2gb?
That's why some of us have been continuing to hold out for a Santa Rosa MacBook including next gen IG.Needs to be Santa Rosa chipset to use the full 4GB - so LED rev MacBook Pro and new silver iMac, not the MacBook, older MacBook Pro or last revision iMac.
i know everyone has stated that the MacBook can access 3.3GB of ram but checking on the intel website
http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/945pm/index.htm
The 945PM express chipset: Dual-channel DDR2 667MHz Memory Support Up to 10.7GB/s of bandwith and up to 4GB memory addressability, for faster system responsiveness.
So if intel stated it can access 4gb why is the MacBook limited to 3.3gb? Is it really a hardware issue or software issue?
![]()
What did you mean by "Earlier Core 2 Duo machines"? I have the white MacBook (Mid 2009 - the last model before the glossy one), it works in 64-bit in Mac OS X Lion (64-bit kernel and extensions: Yes). Will it access full 4 GB of RAM?
I did and I don't think it's the reason to post a new thread about it. You can answer here as well.![]()
Hi all,
I recently purchased 2 x 2gb crucial ram 1066mhz for my MACBook mid 2010 i think or late 2009. cant remember . should be the same thing ?
anyway my main question is,
I replaced the 2 x 1 GB ram with the new crucial ram. When i boot, the bios beeps continuously while the system doesnt boot.
However when i place one 1 x1 Gb ram and 1 x 2GB ram, the system boots and recognises the new ram.
Is there a reason for this? how do i get about solving iT?
Cheers,
First time mac user.