Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Hatchet

macrumors regular
Original poster
In an effort to stay away from the displays on iMac's, how does the 2.8GHz C2D Extreme compare with the (Single) 2.8Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xeon?

Advantages/disadvantages?

Is it worth the extra $500 for the Two 2.8GHZ Quad-Cores?

This is based on both systems with basic configuration and possible aftermarket upgrades on a machine to last 4-5 years.
 
The Xeon has the front side bus speed, cache, and 45nm advantage. I have a feeling Barefeats might be convinced in doing a 2.8 GHz showdown.

The single 2.8 GHz Penryn quad is good choice for a budget Mac Pro but Apple is offering the best value on the octo system. The single socket system processor upgradeability is up in the air still. Remember that you get a $400-500 discount for losing a ~$800 processor.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/414668/

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/411622/
 
single 2.8 quad vs. dual 2.8 quad // vs. 2.8 imac

I've been investigating this myself. Thanks for the post guys 🙂

Can a single 2.8 Quad be upgraded to dual 2.8 Quads by just adding another processor? I'm assuming it would be no problem but I'm a neophyte in this stuff.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.