Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AT&T calls HSPA+ 4G when it really isn't. Just like Verizon calls LTE 4G when it's only 3.75G.
 
Sprint is 3G. All carriers worldwide are 3G or 3.75G. LTEA, which is real 4G, is a few years away from being rolled out to consumers' devices.
 
Sprint is 3G. All carriers worldwide are 3G or 3.75G. LTEA, which is real 4G, is a few years away from being rolled out to consumers' devices.

Hey.....Sprint had WiMAX 4G......yeah, I didn't take it seriously, either!
 
What is it basically that 4G adoption depends on
1. How fast they can adapt the towers to use it
and
2. How fast they can make batteries that can last the same time with it enabled?
 
AT&T calls HSPA+ 4G when it really isn't. Just like Verizon calls LTE 4G when it's only 3.75G.

Didn't the powers that be say HSPA+ was considered 4G? If they did then ATT is telling the "truth". I don't see them actually calling it 4G in any way unless they had the legal right to do so.

That being said if they're playing by the rules what's the problem?
 
Didn't the powers that be say HSPA+ was considered 4G? If they did then ATT is telling the "truth". I don't see them actually calling it 4G in any way unless they had the legal right to do so.

That being said if they're playing by the rules what's the problem?

HSPA+ can obtain 100+Mbsp speeds, but currently is around 48Mbsp. Because of this it currently does not qualify for the 4G designation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.