I recently upgraded from stock 2gb of ram to crucial 4gb. I really can't tell the difference. Any ideas why?
It's easy to get caught up with the idea that 4GB of RAM is a must have for your MBP when you see so many people talking about it in this and other forums. Posts along the lines of: "Just ordered a new MBP from Apple but don't worry 4GB RAM from OWC / Newegg / Crucial is on the way."
It gives the illusion that everyone, on purchasing their laptop, NEEDS to upgrade their memory straight away when of course for most people this is simply not the case. The people who normally upgrade need large amounts of memory for LARGE photo / video editing, virtualising multiple operating systems at once, simulation work etc. Even using FCP and CS3, as you've said, may not eat up as memory as you think if you're not working on very large size files or a large number of them.
Just look at how much memory you're using in Activity Monitor and you'll no doubt have loads free. On my MBP I never got anywhere near even the stock 2GB of memory. Hell on my PC right now I've only got 1GB RAM and I'm only using up half of that in Windows XP!
Going from 1GB to 2GB would've been noticeable but 2GB to 4GB, just like those going from dual core to quad core processors, will only be appreciated by a handful. So it shouldn't be a surprise you don't notice the difference ... YET. You should be happy, you've got loads of spare capacity and at least you've future proofed yourself ...![]()
So, I'll feel the difference once I do more?
So, I'll feel the difference once I do more?