64 gig iPhone 5 box spotting

[gigapocket1]

Here's a link to an article on modmyi with pictures of an iPhone 5 64gig option.
It's interesting. Looks like theirs going to be both a 4s and 5..


Edited:: Added pics

 

[MaxBurn]

64gb is good, if it pushes the 32gb price down that would be great.

 

[Pyromonkey83]

Ill drink to hoping. Its a good thing today is Friday and so begins my pass out drunk weekend and football, and therefore Tuesday should be here before Im sober enought to realize Saturday is over!

Then we can find out once and for all what I will be replacing my terribly slow piece of ***** 8GB iPhone 3G with.

 

[wtmk81]

64gb is good, if it pushes the 32gb price down that would be great.

I agree, I think it should be 32gb 199 and 64gb 299.

 

[TSX]

Yesterdays news

 

[Geckotek]

Posted last night. Duplicate

 

[qtaran111]

Posted last night. Duplicate

Is there a link to the previous post?

 

[bobbytallant]

Assuming the prices in the UK will be tiered in a similar way as usual - it will be £499, £599 & £699 for it unlocked from Apple.

I have in the past devoured getting the best version possible but spending £700 on a phone is pushing it !

 

[BowTheMan89]

This makes me happy!

 

[iMacUser324]

This is not yesterday news, this label says iPhone 5, not iPhone 4S.

 

[iMrNiceGuy0023]

the iPod Touch lineup skips 16 gigs they offer 8, 32 and 64 gigs. Im sure the prices have gone down for the 32 GB

If the iPhone 5 has a 8 megapixel,, filling up 16 GB would be too easy

 

[gigapocket1]

This isnt yesterday news.. Yesterday showed the 4s.. This one shows the iPhone 5..

 

[chris975d]

Image

This is not yesterday news, this label says iPhone 5, not iPhone 4S.

Looks a lot like this label posted yesterday:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1236274/

Even the barcode number on the right side starts off the same: "85909..". Not saying those can't start with similar numbers, but this image (the one showing the iPhone 5) looks fishy (to me at least). Conveniently enough, they've blurred all the other numbers that could point to a Photoshop of this earlier image.

 

[qtaran111]

Looks a lot like this label posted yesterday:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1236274/

Even the barcode number on the right side starts off the same: "85909..". Not saying those can't start with similar numbers, but this image (the one showing the iPhone 5) looks fishy (to me at least). Conveniently enough, they've blurred all the other numbers that could point to a Photoshop of this earlier image.

It's not a shop of the 4S label. I'm not saying it's legit, but it's certainly not a shop of the first label.

 

[auxsend]

I am going to pretend that isn't photoshopped.

 

[Muad'Dib]

Image

This is not yesterday news, this label says iPhone 5, not iPhone 4S.

This isnt yesterday news.. Yesterday showed the 4s.. This one shows the iPhone 5..

The 5 was posted yesterday as well. I'll look for the link.

Edit: Grrr....cheesesteak beat me to it. Oh well...here it is
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1236572/

 

[cheesesteak22]

This isnt yesterday news.. Yesterday showed the 4s.. This one shows the iPhone 5..

Thread from last night:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1236572/

 

[Dangerous Theory]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A5313e Safari/7534.48.3)

Assuming the prices in the UK will be tiered in a similar way as usual - it will be £499, £599 & £699 for it unlocked from Apple.

I have in the past devoured getting the best version possible but spending £700 on a phone is pushing it !

iP4 16 is £510,
iP4 32 is £612

http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/shop_iphone/family/iphone/select?mco=MjU1NTYyNDA