what do you guys think of this www.fastmac.com , they say that their battery last 68% 
longer. Sounds like a good deal to me!
longer. Sounds like a good deal to me!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
68% More Battery power from your Macbook Pro?
- Thread starter Masher500
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Too bad I already purchased my secondary battery, or I might have gone for it . I'd even be happy with 4 hours instead of the 3 hours I get.
. I'd even be happy with 4 hours instead of the 3 hours I get.This is false and misleading.
ONE of their batteries for the early ibooks has 62% higher capacity.
If you look at the MBP batteries they offer, they have a 5% increased capacity.
5% people.
Yet on the front page, they say "up to 62%" because ONE of their batteries, they were able to more than double the capacity. But not on our MBPs.
ONE of their batteries for the early ibooks has 62% higher capacity.
If you look at the MBP batteries they offer, they have a 5% increased capacity.
5% people.
Yet on the front page, they say "up to 62%" because ONE of their batteries, they were able to more than double the capacity. But not on our MBPs.
Irritating to see false advertising like that! Altho, even with same capacity, a MBP battery for $99.95 is alot cheaper than buying elsewhere. OTOH, many 3rd party batteries I've bought in the past fail to live up to advertise capacities - I'd stick with Apple's batteries, I think
iBorg
True, it just like how apple shows a thumbnail of their 30" cinema displays, but says "From $699"
Its a common marketing thing...
Its a common marketing thing...
