To play under OSx, you need changes in the kernel - blu-ray requires that some of the decoding be done in ring 0 to prevent illegal copying. Unfortunately, adding code in ring 0 can destabilize the system - a crash there is very bad news.
One day macs will support all forms of blu-ray. Otherwise they will put alot of normal, computer purchasers off , switchers and professionals.
If sony can now have a blu-ray add on for £35, then surely the prices have fallen enough. They just need to get their act together and support playback. F**k downloads ! They are S**T!
As far as the 'normal' computer purchaser, I don't think Blu-Ray is a deal breaker.
It and the lack of a quad core CPU is all thats stopping me from going out and buying the top-end imac right now.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but can you provide any more info on this?
a.) how exactly would decoding in ring 0 be any more secure? You still have to spit the results back out to userland where they can be easily captured. Theres several tools in the windows domain that do this.
b.) Bluray works fine on Win XP which does not have any native "bluray" code built into the kernel.
When hell freezes over. Apple will probably skip right over blu-ray. They have no need to add it to their lineup. They want you to buy your media from them.
Optical disc drives, how 20th Century . . .![]()
It won't be until the 22nd century when ISPs catch up to the individual bandwidth capacity required to make Full HD digital movies feasible.
When people want a movie they want it NOW, not two days from now when it finishes downloading.
Your time calculation is way off with FIOS and U-verse already being deployed.