Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

astray

macrumors member
Original poster
May 9, 2003
60
0
uk
Heres the latest from MacB:

Here of other exclusive rumours on the mother chart of the PPC 970. The source can be described as extrèmement reliable. But for lack of evidence they remain rumours.

This information relates to a mother chart of PPC 970 of preproduction sent to very rare APPLE partners.

- the mother chart has a form more rectangular than square (we had already had one moment ago of information on a chart "all in length").
- the processor is welded above (traditional for a preproduction) surmounted of a traditional squanderer.
- But especially, there are 8 connectors of RAM above (PC3200 a priori) with which 4 are covered with enormous a sticker "not uses" above. These 4 are cablés differently of the 4 others (not more infos).

One can imagine several explanations to the presence from these 4 slots nonfunctional. Here by order ascending of probability.
1) (not very probable) They were abandoned in the final version
2) (possible) on the mother chart dual, each processor will have its own RAM for more band-width
3) (probable) technology Twin Bank was not implemented yet on this chart of preproduction and will be it then.

Go more than 6 weeks for any knowledge!
- [ Rumour ] PPC 970 Rumors Loop give a layer from there - Lionel - 16:58:13
LoopRumors published rumours which corroborate those completely that we had given you a few weeks ago.

Foxconn (which is supposed to manufacture the machines containing PPC 970) would have received 20 000 Processors PPC 970 to 1,4 GHz, 40 000 to 1,6 GHz. IBM would have 50 000 Processors with 1,8 GHz in stock including 40 000 for Foxconn.
IBM would also have processors with 2 GHz in less number. APPLE would wait until there are 40 000 in stock of them to use them.
To finish, the PPC 970 should reach 2,3 to 2,5 GHz before being replaced by the PPC 980 derived from Power 5.

All this resembles so much so that we have told for a few weeks that there are 2 assumptions:
1) All information of our sources is perfectly exact. (always let us think We it).
2) the source of this information read the rumours of Macbidouille....

With you to choose:) ""

or go here: http://www.macbidouille.com/niouzcontenu.php?date=2003-05-13#5529
 
970 Motherboard and Chip Delivery?

MacBidouille posts some details about prototype motherboards for the PowerPC 970. As reported before, they indicate that the motherboards are more rectangular than square and have 8 RAM connectors -- 4 of which were covered by a Do Not Use sticker. They speculate on the reasons why this might be the case, but have no definitive information.

Meanwhile, LoopRumors posts what they claim to be shipment information to Foxconn. They report that Foxconn has already received 20,000 1.4GHz 970s and 40,000 1.6GHz 970s. 40,000 1.8GHz 970s are reportly due tommorrow.
 
whats the timeframe of a production run?

looks like there will be 4 pmac configurations, instead the ususal 3:

fast: SP 970 1.4 Ghz
faster: DP 970 1.6 Ghz
fastest: DP 970 1.8 Ghz
ultimate: DP 970 2.0Ghz

that's my guess for the lines, whenever it comes out....around june or july.

-dornball
 
Cool.

Let's hope the prices arn't too far off the current line up when they ship.

That's if this rumour amounts to anything that is.
 
If a Dual 2Ghz 970 was released then I would be very tempted to get one! This is even though I have a Dual 1Ghz now! Would have to sell mine + get a new machine!
 
guys you must be watching MacBidouille 24/7: you post their items very quickly indeed... (or do they send you a notification ?).

NicoMan
 
The most definitive report yet suggesting that the 970 will not only be announced next month, but that 970 Macs will go on sale then or shortly thereafter. Great news!
 
Originally posted by dabirdwell
Please be true...

Can the 1.4's go in PowerBooks? What are the power usage figures?
The PowerPC 970 is not supposed to have power saving features, you'd rather not expect to see it in a PowerBook.
 
now with all this info about chipsets and board designs, why can't we get a glimps (rendering, whatever) of the new case? Those boards have to go in something?
 
Originally posted by dornball
whats the timeframe of a production run?

looks like there will be 4 pmac configurations, instead the ususal 3:

fast: SP 970 1.4 Ghz
faster: DP 970 1.6 Ghz
fastest: DP 970 1.8 Ghz
ultimate: DP 970 2.0Ghz

that's my guess for the lines, whenever it comes out....around june or july.

-dornball

1.4 for the powerbook
1.6-2.0 for the powermac

Wolf
 
Originally posted by Cabrewolf
1.4 for the powerbook
1.6-2.0 for the powermac

Wolf

wolf,
i hope your right. i prefer your specs. if there was a 970 powerbook available, i would order it in a heartbeat.

-dornball
 
wahoo.. :D

hence, with 8 ram slots. it seems not to be a pb mobo ... :(
I know it is fairly unpossible, but i want a pb with a 970 before august :D apple do somethin'
 
don't think that's correct.

Originally posted by dornball
whats the timeframe of a production run?

looks like there will be 4 pmac configurations, instead the ususal 3:

fast: SP 970 1.4 Ghz
faster: DP 970 1.6 Ghz
fastest: DP 970 1.8 Ghz
ultimate: DP 970 2.0Ghz

that's my guess for the lines, whenever it comes out....around june or july.

-dornball

i hate to piss on your chips, but IMO: you won't see then use the 2.0Ghz. just because they exsist, doesn't men we (the consumer) get to see them. it doesn't look like they are in any sort of bulk production either.

i'd still be happy with your line up regardless.
 
I got bored reading, it's like Dvorak's drivel. I love the way they think If IBM charge a lot for the 970 and If that means apple can't compete in the long term on price they're screwed. Why not be more positive or does that just not get the hits someone needs on their site to give their word credibility ?

USS Clueless ? Damn Right!!!
 
Originally posted by Christner
Check out Steven Den Beste's opinion on Apple's new music store strategy and the likelihood that the 970 will be its salvation:

http://www.denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2003/05/Applesexitstrategy.shtml

Yet another doom-and-gloomer or does he have the facts right?

Looks exactly like every other 'death of Apple' article I've ever read. Complete with "facts" and MBA-student-wannabe business analysis.

Of course, someday in the future Apple *will* stop making computers. When that eventually happens all of these people will say, "See, I predicted that 20 years ago." :rolleyes:

Edit: or "50 years ago" :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.