I want to ask of you, a question of ethics and morality. I know someone who found a lost BlackBerry in the street, who says it was barred (and it was) at the time of discovery. Said person who found BB, kept it for 1.5 months, and then sold it to another person, with NO sim card, NO personal data on it, nothing!
Herein lies the question; it was obviously a contract handset, and the case being that the phone had been barred for over 1.5 months (ish), surely service provider of said BB would have issued a new one, under insurance, so is it immoral that the person who bought it, bought it as barred, and empty, and without SIM?
IMHO, I see no immorality nor harm in buyer keeping it, as it is now useless, and contains nothing from the original owner - how about you?
Thank you
Herein lies the question; it was obviously a contract handset, and the case being that the phone had been barred for over 1.5 months (ish), surely service provider of said BB would have issued a new one, under insurance, so is it immoral that the person who bought it, bought it as barred, and empty, and without SIM?
IMHO, I see no immorality nor harm in buyer keeping it, as it is now useless, and contains nothing from the original owner - how about you?
Thank you
Last edited: