Hey guys,
I've posted once or twice but I'm essentially new here. After the first couple decades of my life being a financially-induced Windows wonderland, I'm finally at a point where I can afford a far-superior Mac for the first time. It's only appropriate therefore that we're simultaneously in the midst of an unprecedented "the current model is outdated so don't buy it" "no go for it it's still good" crisis. I've decided though, given Apple's respectable policies in this regard, that the multi-hundred dollar savings associated with refurbished models cannot be passed up. Especially for me as a not-so-extravagant student. This in fact accounts for what discounts should be in place in this stage of the computers' lives, and excepting a few isolated situations, refurb Macs are widely considered to be every bit as good as their new counterparts thanks to the company's rigorous testing and certification. This of course renders the refresh situation irrelevant because even if an improved model does come out this month, it will likely be at least a couple of months before refurbished 2012 iMacs are available, which would put me back at square one.
THEREFORE - the possibility this does open up is that I can get a much improved machine for a comparable price to what I was going to pay for a more modest setup new. As a photographer I am highly seduced by the larger 27" monitor. I'm considering the 3rd and 2nd models from the top:
-2.7 ghz i5
-3.1 ghz i5
There is an i7 model available refurbished, but I'd have to say it's overkill for my needs considering my budget. The most important function for my computer is photo and video editing. A lot of these speed upgrades seem to have a lot to do with gaming but I'd imagine it has to have some effect on multimedia as well. I do Flight Simulator occasionally but that's as far into games as I've ever gotten. There are two main differences for the higher model and those are 3.1 ghz over 2.7, as well as doubling the GPU from 512MB to 1GB. I'm pretty inexperienced in both these areas. So if I use Lightroom and Photoshop on a regular basis, do you think the 3.1 is a significant step-up for $250 extra, or would I need the 3.4 i7 to notice any major difference? It's tempting to get the cheapest but this will also be my last computer purchase for many years to come.
Also - am I making the right decision at all to get a better but older computer refurbished rather than a basic one new when they're available? Last year I got a 2008 high-end camera refurbished for the price of an entry-level one new, and I'm still so glad I did every day as it continues to offer more than equally priced current models. Could I have the same thrifty success in computers?
That turned out pretty long but I'd appreciate any insight you all have.
Thanks,
Mark
I've posted once or twice but I'm essentially new here. After the first couple decades of my life being a financially-induced Windows wonderland, I'm finally at a point where I can afford a far-superior Mac for the first time. It's only appropriate therefore that we're simultaneously in the midst of an unprecedented "the current model is outdated so don't buy it" "no go for it it's still good" crisis. I've decided though, given Apple's respectable policies in this regard, that the multi-hundred dollar savings associated with refurbished models cannot be passed up. Especially for me as a not-so-extravagant student. This in fact accounts for what discounts should be in place in this stage of the computers' lives, and excepting a few isolated situations, refurb Macs are widely considered to be every bit as good as their new counterparts thanks to the company's rigorous testing and certification. This of course renders the refresh situation irrelevant because even if an improved model does come out this month, it will likely be at least a couple of months before refurbished 2012 iMacs are available, which would put me back at square one.
THEREFORE - the possibility this does open up is that I can get a much improved machine for a comparable price to what I was going to pay for a more modest setup new. As a photographer I am highly seduced by the larger 27" monitor. I'm considering the 3rd and 2nd models from the top:
-2.7 ghz i5
-3.1 ghz i5
There is an i7 model available refurbished, but I'd have to say it's overkill for my needs considering my budget. The most important function for my computer is photo and video editing. A lot of these speed upgrades seem to have a lot to do with gaming but I'd imagine it has to have some effect on multimedia as well. I do Flight Simulator occasionally but that's as far into games as I've ever gotten. There are two main differences for the higher model and those are 3.1 ghz over 2.7, as well as doubling the GPU from 512MB to 1GB. I'm pretty inexperienced in both these areas. So if I use Lightroom and Photoshop on a regular basis, do you think the 3.1 is a significant step-up for $250 extra, or would I need the 3.4 i7 to notice any major difference? It's tempting to get the cheapest but this will also be my last computer purchase for many years to come.
Also - am I making the right decision at all to get a better but older computer refurbished rather than a basic one new when they're available? Last year I got a 2008 high-end camera refurbished for the price of an entry-level one new, and I'm still so glad I did every day as it continues to offer more than equally priced current models. Could I have the same thrifty success in computers?
That turned out pretty long but I'd appreciate any insight you all have.
Thanks,
Mark