...I just saw a 1 hour G4 special about the formation of Apple with Steve Jobs.
One thing intrigued me:
-When Steve was fired from Apple way back then and this other guy took over, the line-up that Apple developed after had no distinguishable difference from each other, confusing the consumers. This eventually almost brought Apple to bankruptcy. Until Steve returned and re-invented the mac with the release of the iMac...and you know what happened next.
Isn't this similar to what's happening now? Steve is obviously still the head guru at Apple but with his absence, who is deciding for him? With the announcement of the new MacBook Pro line, people I know became confused. Is Steve still calling the shots? I hope so. We need him back, badly.
I might not be an Apple historian but I can't help but think about this after watching the special.
One thing intrigued me:
-When Steve was fired from Apple way back then and this other guy took over, the line-up that Apple developed after had no distinguishable difference from each other, confusing the consumers. This eventually almost brought Apple to bankruptcy. Until Steve returned and re-invented the mac with the release of the iMac...and you know what happened next.
Isn't this similar to what's happening now? Steve is obviously still the head guru at Apple but with his absence, who is deciding for him? With the announcement of the new MacBook Pro line, people I know became confused. Is Steve still calling the shots? I hope so. We need him back, badly.
I might not be an Apple historian but I can't help but think about this after watching the special.