Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If it's true then it would work on an iPad Air as long as the Pencil is on, since the iPad doesn't care it's a Pencil. Does it?
 
If it's true then it would work on an iPad Air as long as the Pencil is on, since the iPad doesn't care it's a Pencil. Does it?
That's what I'm thinking.. It should work on iPhone 6 too..
 
It doesn't work on any other iOS device. The iPad Pro scans at 240hz when it detects the Pencil, which reduces the latency and improves the accuracy.
 
It doesn't work on any other iOS device. The iPad Pro scans at 240hz when it detects the Pencil, which reduces the latency and improves the accuracy.
Does that mean the display's refresh rate is 240hz? I find that hard to believe, but would be cool if it was true.
 
He's speculating. In Apple's own iPad Pro video they talk about making the display different to have a more accurate digitizer. There is no way it's the same as other iPads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
So hes wrong? I dont understand, why dont he just test it on any other ios device?
 
It's already been tested by many on other iPads. It only works on the iPad Pro. Just like Apple says.

And to be fair to Gruber, the OP is misinterpreting. Gruber in his podcast speculates that the Pencil uses radio. But he never says it works with other iPads.
 
I believe he's trying to say that the Apple Pencil would theoretically work on other iOS devices, but the iPad Pro has a more advanced display so that the pencil can be accurate and interface with it. An iFixit teardown of iPad pro did reveal an extra chipset for Pencil input, so obviously there's something going on.

I'm sure getting the Pencil to work on other iOS devices isn't too hard, but it would require additional hardware to be built into the device.
 
It's already been tested by many on other iPads. It only works on the iPad Pro. Just like Apple says.

And to be fair to Gruber, the OP is misinterpreting. Gruber in his podcast speculates that the Pencil uses radio.

I said verbatim,

"I didn't know that. He isn't 100% certain either. Is it true?"

But he never says it works with other iPads.
I didn't say that he said it.
 
Last edited:
Apparently the display is still the same as other iOS devices. The Apple pencil emits radio waves on the display to register drawings.

I didn't know that. He isn't 100% certain either. Is it true?

Listen from the 7:20 mark.
http://daringfireball.net/thetalkshow/2015/11/21/ep-136

John Gruber is a smart guy and his podcasts are great but he is not, in fact, that tech savvy and he's most likely wrong about this. The Pencil is not capacitive so there must be a different tech inside the iPad itself that detects position.
 
Obviously the touch screen must have the capacity to register/receive the input of the Pencil. There is not anything in other iOS devices that would be capable of doing this and we also know that the touch screens of these devices are not nearly as precise to make this work. The Pencil alone is not doing anything on these devices that could not be replicated by an ordinary stylus.

I dont understand, why dont he just test it on any other ios device?

Because you cannot rule out that way that it is technically impossible to make it work. Apple is known to artificially restrict features with software. It seems that nobody outside Apple knows the secret yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechGod
Apparently the display is still the same as other iOS devices. The Apple pencil emits radio waves on the display to register drawings.

I didn't know that. He isn't 100% certain either. Is it true?

Listen from the 7:20 mark.
http://daringfireball.net/thetalkshow/2015/11/21/ep-136
A regular old Samsung S5 can have the sensitivity turned up so that a regular #2 pencil will work great, nothing special needed as it is in the settings. I wanted to see if I could discover how via BT to initiate the other mode on the iPP but now someone else will have to.
Ive wondered if a regular iPad could be done the same way for a long time.
 
Tech journalists don't understand tech, shocking.

What you have is an active capacitive system. The digitizer itself is still a traditional capacitive touch digitizer (like N-trig), but the pen emits a distinct signature the digitizer will detect.

The digitizer itself polls at 240hz, this has nothing to do with LCD panel refresh rate. This is likely a hardware improvement over the older capacitive digitizers and probably wouldn't work on older hardware.

The capacitive digitizer grid also has greatly improved linearity and accurayc, most likely due to an increase in density. This is also a hardware change.

Now to address the issue: Yes, the existing digitizers could likely be adjusted to read the active capacitive signal of the Pencil, but they would have a lower polling rate AND significantly worse linearity/accuracy than what we see now. Performance would be quite a bit worse, which would make the whole system look bad (like N-trig) and of course eat into Pro sales.
 
Does that mean the display's refresh rate is 240hz? I find that hard to believe, but would be cool if it was true.

No, the display scans for Pencil input at 240Hz. Normal touch input is scanned at 120Hz. Screen refresh rate however is most likely 60Hz, as a higher refresh rate is usually not noticeable.
 
Does that mean the display's refresh rate is 240hz? I find that hard to believe, but would be cool if it was true.
The rate varies, and Apple has that timer coalescing chip which was first made for the 5K iMac, now in the iPad Pro.

So this isn't simply a case of the screen being the same, there is much more to it that makes the pencil work.
 
No, the display scans for Pencil input at 240Hz. Normal touch input is scanned at 120Hz. Screen refresh rate however is most likely 60Hz, as a higher refresh rate is usually not noticeable.

A higher refresh rate is extremely noticeable with moving content, but there are currently very few IPS panels capable of 120hz refresh. Getting anything out of it also requires hardware that can put out 120 frames/sec

The old claim that humans can't tell the difference between 60fps and higher was based on a study with very poor methods and is clearly absurd to anyone who's seen higher frame rate content.
 
**Sorry about the double post, meant to combine this into the post above

- Although the pressure sensitivity of the Pencil is transmitted to the iPP by BT, I haven't seen an explanation on how the angle sensing works (I may just not have read enough or listened to any podcasts). However, to me it seems there's something in the iPP that lets the angle sensing operate, although I guess technically it could work by calculating the difference of orientation in space of the iPP and the Pencil. This seems like it would take a lot continual computation.

I won't speculate further on its operation, but will leave that as an exercise for the reader.

The version I've heard is that the tilt detection works by having two emitters in the pencil. One is in the very end of the tip (in the little "ball" at the end of the cone) which is how it can actually detect the position of contact without offset at any angle (this is also why the tip is a bit larger than the SP4 pen, which has the emitter in the pen itself).

The second emitter is farther up I the pen. The digitizer compares the two signals to determine tilt. This is why you can mess up tilt detection by having your finger too close to the tip on screen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.