VincentVega said:
With a little effort and common sense, it's not hard to avoid spyware and viruses. Unfortunately many PC users don't seem to be that wise.
That's the point; 500 million PC users all have to expend regular effort because the operating system manufacturer decided it was a fine idea to allow lots of flexibility for applications to open processes and exchange data autonomously, and tightly integrate network access with the OS. Which gave virus writers and spyware writers a big, beautiful, unsecured (and perhaps unsecurable) sandbox to be creative in.
And why: Because Microsoft has inverted the traditional quality-assurance cost-benefit equation. They have pulled off the stunning accomplishment of moving quality assurance and remediation costs completely off of their balance sheet and onto their customers' by releasing products that force the CUSTOMERS to assume the risk, the testing and the repair labour.
And then they get them to pay every year for upgrades! I tell you it is stone-cold brilliant, and a scheme of this scale has never been accomplished in the history of business.
Take the 10 minutes (best case) to 1 hour (typical?) per month that is required for preventative maintenance, Windows updates, security updates and rebooting after updates -- now multiply this times approximately 500,000,000 Windows machines (it was actually 603 million total computers in 2001, we have to allow for growth of another 240 million or so, but then allow for retirement and non-Windows machines) and you have
three billion hours per year of wasted human productivity -- just on routine maintenance, not counting bugs, crashes, viruses, spyware and remediation of damaged systems.
John Dvorak counts 700 million machines and says "Gates said that 5 percent of Windows machines crash, on average, twice daily. Put another way, this means that 10 percent of Windows machines crash every day...With 10 percent of them crashing daily, we have 70 million crashes every 24 hours... that's roughly 30 billion crashes per year."
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1210067,00.asp
Which all goes to my contention that Bill Gates is responsible for more overall human misery than any person alive.
Thanks,
Trevor