X xparaparafreakx macrumors 65816 Original poster Jul 29, 2005 1,273 1 Apr 16, 2007 #1 Would you pay $499 to get Leopard?
7 72930 Retired May 16, 2006 9,060 4 Apr 16, 2007 #2 No, but even if I was rich enough, it is apparently incredibly buggy, and I would prefer a stable Tiger
No, but even if I was rich enough, it is apparently incredibly buggy, and I would prefer a stable Tiger
twoodcc macrumors P6 Feb 3, 2005 15,307 26 Right side of wrong Apr 16, 2007 #3 no, but the thought has crossed my mind
Nugget Contributor Nov 24, 2002 2,190 1,551 Tejas Hill Country Apr 16, 2007 #4 It's not in a condition you'd want to use right now, and when it does get stable the wait until you can buy it at the normal retail price will be far too short to justify the expense.
It's not in a condition you'd want to use right now, and when it does get stable the wait until you can buy it at the normal retail price will be far too short to justify the expense.
xfiftyfour macrumors 68030 Apr 14, 2006 2,573 0 Clemson, SC Apr 16, 2007 #5 No, IMO that's a silly waste of money.
pilotError macrumors 68020 Apr 12, 2006 2,237 4 Long Island Apr 16, 2007 #6 Only if your looking at a Major hardware purchase. Or if you can justify the need for Beta versions of Leopard... If your just an end user, its just a waste of cash.
Only if your looking at a Major hardware purchase. Or if you can justify the need for Beta versions of Leopard... If your just an end user, its just a waste of cash.