Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

memphismac

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 22, 2003
89
3
I'm looking to replace my current external drive with a newer, larger drive. My current drive is connected via Firewire and houses my iTunes library, plus movie files, documents, etc.

I'm trying to decide between a portable drive (the Western Digital Passport, for example), and another desktop drive (like say, this one:http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Western...7952&skuId=9467178&st=WDBAAF0010HBK&cp=1&lp=1)

Questions I have:
- Is there any reason to be concerned about longevity when using a portable drive?
- Does a desktop drive typically perform better than a desktop drive?
- Is there a noticeable speed difference between USB 2.0 and Firewire?
And should that be a deciding factor in what I buy?

Thanks for any help here...

Brian
 
- Is there any reason to be concerned about longevity when using a portable drive?

Not really, it can fail after 2 hours or 20 years, no matter is it 2.5" or 3.5"

- Does a desktop drive typically perform better than a desktop drive?

Yes, but because you are using externally, USB or FW800 will be limiting it

- Is there a noticeable speed difference between USB 2.0 and Firewire?

Yes. With USB you can get roughly ~60MB/s while with FW800 ~85MB/s. FW800 drives are more expensive so unless you need speed, USB is fine and you already have FireWire one so use it as well
 
Yes. Firewire is def. better.

That's what I thought. And unfortunately, drives with Firewire are a lot more expensive and outside my price range.

I went out today and got good deals on a Seagate FreeAgent (http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-FreeA...1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1270665533&sr=1-1-fkmr0) and a Western Digital My Book Essential (http://www.amazon.com/Western-Digit...1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1270665468&sr=1-1).

Both 1.5TB. Both $129
Seagate has 5 year parts warranty.
WD has 2-year parts & labor warranty.

Seagate says it's up to 7200 RPM.
Western Digital doesn't make any kind of claim on speed.

Seagate says it has a 32MB cache.
Western Digital doesn't make any kind of claim on cache size.

I'm going to take them home, stare at them, and decide which one to open.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.