I can say this: comparing the Core i9 to my 2.6 i7 15" shows that the performance difference under load is ~3 to 5%. Otherwise, nothing else has changed for me with this update. Battery life is still great, heat is the same, and fan noise (or lack thereof) is the same as well. Although I really wish Apple allowed us to decide wether or not we would like the fans to kick in quicker in order to boost performance. I typically have headphones on while editing an it would not make a difference to me if it kicked in after 15-30 seconds of load instead of 1-1.5 mins.
Maybe I missed it, whats the sustained ghz on load? and battery life please? really appreciated.
If scaling correctly, all models should have performance gain and i7 should STILL performs similarly than the more expensive i9 models.
I am concerned that Apple may intentionally twist the patch so that the i9 models get more performance improvement than other models in order to mislead people into buying the i9 model.
In Apple stores in Canada, the only model that has 1TB is the i9 model. So if somebody wants a 1TB model and doesn't want to wait, that person buys the i9 model.
It effects the i9s more because they exhibit more throttling. More problem, more impact of the fix.
I can say this: comparing the Core i9 to my 2.6 i7 15" shows that the performance difference under load is ~3 to 5%. Otherwise, nothing else has changed for me with this update. Battery life is still great, heat is the same, and fan noise (or lack thereof) is the same as well. Although I really wish Apple allowed us to decide wether or not we would like the fans to kick in quicker in order to boost performance. I typically have headphones on while editing an it would not make a difference to me if it kicked in after 15-30 seconds of load instead of 1-1.5 mins.
That's not necessarily the case if part of the fix is a firmware update.As somebody pointed out, the patch can’t address the issue when users are running Bootcamp.
There's plenty of tools in Windows to manage the clock rate.As somebody pointed out, the patch can’t address the issue when users are running Bootcamp.
If scaling correctly, all models should have performance gain and i7 should STILL performs similarly than the more expensive i9 models.
I am concerned that Apple may intentionally twist the patch so that the i9 models get more performance improvement than other models in order to mislead people into buying the i9 model.