I've got a 3rd gen extreme and it's about time to upgrade. For the first time in a while, I'm looking at an Asus unless there is enough motivation and perks to pay $199 for the 6th gen extreme
unless there is enough motivation and perks to pay $199 for the 6th gen extreme
I've got a 3rd gen extreme and it's about time to upgrade. For the first time in a while, I'm looking at an Asus unless there is enough motivation and perks to pay $199 for the 6th gen extreme
The general perks of the AirPort line in general was ease of setup, reliability, and stability. The ASUS has the stronger antennas as well as more advanced features and configuration.
This. I started with the latest AirPort Extreme but decided to give the asus a try. A little more difficult to setup (though still easy), but I get better range and speeds all around. Kept the asus, returned the AirPort Extreme.
I've got a 3rd gen extreme and it's about time to upgrade. For the first time in a while, I'm looking at an Asus unless there is enough motivation and perks to pay $199 for the 6th gen extreme
Unless you need the Time Machine compatability of the new Extreme it has little to offer over the new Asus units in terms of range, speed, and features.
Great to hear both sides of the "coin" here. I'm going to check out the smallnetbuilder reviews and keep you guys posted!
Great to hear both sides of the "coin" here. I'm going to check out the smallnetbuilder reviews and keep you guys posted!
Fair enough.
In addition to the individual reviews of the RT-AC68U (and Netgear R7000) and the A1521 Extreme at SmallNetBuilder, I also recommend you check out these useful charts.
By the way, while I haven't played any jokes on my Asus, I have pushed a serious amount of data through it and as of yet haven't managed to crash it.![]()
I don't recall making any claims that your experiences were irrelevant. I was just adding my own into the mix.I guess my experience is irrelevant
as that is not something that the ASUS is advertised as being capable of.
I don't recall making any claims that your experiences were irrelevant. I was just adding my own into the mix.
By the way, was this an RT-AC68U that you just happened to have laying around that crashed on you?
I did make it clear that I don't have any personal experience with the Airport Extreme. I bought the Asus based on its excellent reviews and superior performance.
Another good point for the Asus I forgot to mention is that they are quite regular with firmware updates to hone performance. This is in direct contrast to Netgear who are not nearly as regular with theirs. Apple, I have no idea about as far as firmware updates for the Extreme go. Do tell.
I'm not entirely sure what the that you're referring to here is, but where is the Airport Extreme advertised as being capable of it, whatever it is?
Well, I said it was irrelevant as no home is going to strain a network that much.
As for firmware updates, ASUS is faster, but Apple takes more time to squash most if not all bugs and their firmwares generally are more for feature introduction. I am pleased with Apple's stable and consistent support of the AirPort line.
Oh, your Eagle Scout project. Yes, I will admit I have not come close to putting that much of load on my Asus, yet.
I've dealt with Netgear routers in the past and there is no question that they do indeed suck with support and updates. This is probably why the RT-AC68U gets so much love over the Netgear R7000 in spite of the Netgear actually having slightly better performance.
Appreciate the info, thanks.![]()
I have multiple apple devices in my house. The Apple routers are not only very stable, they also provide for some "additional benefits" for Apple users -
just to name a few:
Wake up on Lan - transparent to users - nice when you want to stream stuff from your iMac to your Apple TV
Screen sharing local - and Back to my Mac -> lets you remote log in to your different apple computers fromLAN and WAN if properly set up.
Remote access of Time capsule hardisk without having a degree in IT
I know I could set most of that on any previously mentioned router, but it with Apple routers "it just works"
I love the stability of the Apple products and the It Just Works aspect of it, but the product manager over there has lost his gourd.
I filed a bunch of reports noting the loss of serious settings like individual band selection, the non-deterministic "auto" selection of extended bands, transmit power, settings to exclude b/g/n clients are all weirdly reversed (generally people don't want to exclude the faster clients, they want to exclude the slower ones), the nonsensically out of date Windows client, etc. All of them got closed out without so much as a reasonable explanation.
You need to understand the market and what makes a wireless access point usable to succeed, and as the large number of people struggling to find old settings can attest, the direction Apple has been taking the Airport Extreme in is the wrong one. Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler. The new Airport Utility has made things too simple to the point of deleting settings necessary for proper configuration.
Here's the main problem (and it's a big one in our home) with the apple router : for whatever reason (and I've bought and returned 3 of them and done countless hours of net research to no avail) you CANNOT run two or more Xbox one consoles on the same network with an apple router. The lag is intermittently terrible. I think there is an issue with upnp but really don't know other than after tearing my hair out for weeks I went back and bought the netgear again (had returned one previously due to driver (lack of) support) just to be able to have our consoles work.
The Airport Extreme doesn't support upnp, so pretty unlikely that there's an issue with the feature. Also don't understand the comment about drivers. In what sense would you need drivers for a router?