Nuff said, are there any MLheads in the forum and potential insights on picking this up instead of a Mac Studio ?
@splifingate mind sharing your workflow ? I have the invoice drafted for two, still on the edge after the reviews outlining weak inference.
As of yet, I don't have a 'workflow': this is just a learning (to understand the mechanisms and paradigms) machine for me.
Initially, I had decided on getting two DGX's (rather than investing in a RTX Pro 6000).
Though I am missing-out on the higher-end networking features (and by-virtue, all the aspects of learning available in this space) by going solo, I have concluded that one is enough for me to learn the majority of what I thought I might need to know.
Depending on your previous experience(s), you may find that the DGX is not gana pull-ahead in inference. Think of it as a whole-package learning machine that excels at more baseline levels. While not particularly exemplary in one (or another) area, it provides a well-rounded, performant environment.
For these (and a few more) I have decided to let my dual-setup reservation lapse.
I can always get another (or more/other), in the future![]()
Thank you for sharing. I feel more at ease letting the reservation lapse when reading the you did the same. Saving up for the M5 studio and getting the DGX next calendar year then.
You may not really need the DGX, but the CUDA integration might tip that scale
Full-Stack seemed important for my introduction into the Arena. I may have more to share after I find the space to work with it more.
I have a few things I want to achieve with VLMS and point clouds, we'll see when I get to it. The to-do list is daunting.
Would love to hear more from your experience.
I'm currently teaching FT, working-through my MAT, and being the GC for my house reno(s) . . . this leaves little time for my inner geek to get out
I will share what I can (when I can).