Wow very interesting. So, is there any changes from 20 or 30 years ago? Like do you process it at home or shops?
No, I don't process at home, and never did.
Re changes: Paradoxically, the quality of film available is excellent nowadays, or, rather, the market for cheap, poor-quality film has evaporated, - as most people use digital cameras - and all that remains is good quality - or, sometimes exceptionally good quality - film.
And the few companies that make film, have concentrated on producing very good quality (if a relatively limited range) film.
Other changes: The plethora of one hour photo shops that used to be seen on every high street have all but disappeared; there are a few, small, dedicated places where one can get film developed, but not many.
Professional quality film - especially black and white - needs to be sent away as local stores, even camera shops, don't develop it any longer - so, in some cases, it takes a lot more time to have film developed, than it did twenty years ago.
Do you mind if i ask why you prefer film or digital ?
A number of reasons.
Firstly, it took digital technology quite a few years to reach the standard of image/picture produced by a good quality SLR (or rangefinder); I never wanted a cheap digital camera, or to be part of the crowd that experimented with a new format, especially if that delivered an inferior quality product or image.
I understood the convenience; I just preferred quality.
Secondly, when digital cameras of the quality I would have been interested in finally made an appearance, they were massive monsters, incredibly large and heavy: I am a short, middle aged woman - I wanted a very good quality camera but not having to carry, - or stagger around under the weight of - what felt like rocks whenever I wished to venture out of doors to shoot a frame or two.
Thirdly, as mentioned above, paradoxically, the quality of products available for traditional photographers - such as film - improved exponentially.
I have often been struck by how the very best version of a particular product is designed just as that product is about to become obsolete (e.g. suits of armour - the design of which reached incredible sophistication - as gunpowder transformed warfare and replaced the older weaponry of swords, and bows and arrows; the development of the exquisitely beautiful - and powerfully fast - clipper sailing ships, just as steam replaced sail, and so on); anyway, the quality of film improved just as it fell out of use.
Fourthly, as some seriously good photographers made the move to digital, their stunning film equipment became available at affordable prices.
Around a decade ago, my Nikon F100 was stolen, and I debated at that time whether I should consider switching to digital or staying with film, but buying the sort of film camera I had always longed for.
I decided to stay with film, and make the move to Leica, as some seriously good Leica equipment - while still stupidly expensive - was now within reach and I had always liked the size, quality and sheer appeal of Leica.
My current camera is an exquisite Leica M6 TTL, a rangefinder, and it is beautifully ergonomic in my hand; small enough for me to carry easily (yet unobtrusively) yet sufficiently solid and beautifully constructed for it to not readily come to any harm.
And the lenses are superb; small, exquisitely engineered, fast, and phenomenal - I doubt that I will ever want to shoot with anything else, but may consider a switch to digital - with a Leica M10, - when funds permit.
.
